By 
You can say whatever you want about Qualcomm’s speed in getting their newer chipsets inside of devices, but they do come to market with technology comparable to their competitors. Such is the case with the MSM8660 – the same chipset inside of the HTC EVO 3D and the supposed HTC Pyramid.
The EVO 3D’s chipset is clocked at 1.2GHz and we didn’t really have enough time with it to run benchmarks on it. Qualcomm seems to be able to clock the thing to 1.5Ghz, though. We’re not too surprised considering they have a single-core chipset inside the HTC Flyer running at those speeds, but our mind was blown after seeing the effects of this overclock.
In a test where the performance of Quake 3 is tested, the chipset outpaces the likes of NVIDIA’s Tegra 2, Samsung’s Hummingbird, and Texas Instruments’s OMAP platform. Quadrant tests reflect much of the same (though we’re aware that many of you don’t put too much stock into Quadrant results). The above photo also shows its performancce in the GL Benchmarks test.
You should note that this chipset does not take into account real-world performance – battery life would be at an absolute premium if you were to just drop this into a smartphone in its current state. Still, it’s quite impressive and we can’t wait to see how this thing will perform inside of actual phones whenever Qualcomm’s OEM partners begin to adopt it. (To date, the fastest chipset OEMs have provided for commercially-available products is the HTC EVO 3D.) [Anandtech via IntoMobile]
All the more hype for my upgrade
All the more hype for my upgrade
All the more hype for my upgrade
All the more hype for my upgrade
All the more hype for my upgrade
All the more hype for my upgrade
I can’t wait to get my hands on the Evo 3D.
I can’t wait to get my hands on the Evo 3D.
I can’t wait to get my hands on the Evo 3D.
I can’t wait to get my hands on the Evo 3D.
I can’t wait to get my hands on the Evo 3D.
I can’t wait to get my hands on the Evo 3D.
I want it all, and I want it now. – Queen
I want it all, and I want it now. – Queen
I want it all, and I want it now. – Queen
I want it all, and I want it now. – Queen
I want it all, and I want it now. – Queen
I want it all, and I want it now. – Queen
lmao @ iphone 4 ???whats up with tht ?
and
wow my mt4g is looking oldddd
lmao @ iphone 4 ???whats up with tht ?
and
wow my mt4g is looking oldddd
lmao @ iphone 4 ???whats up with tht ?
and
wow my mt4g is looking oldddd
lmao @ iphone 4 ???whats up with tht ?
and
wow my mt4g is looking oldddd
lmao @ iphone 4 ???whats up with tht ?
and
wow my mt4g is looking oldddd
lmao @ iphone 4 ???whats up with tht ?
and
wow my mt4g is looking oldddd
LOL..
Part of it is the resolution…
LOL..
Part of it is the resolution…
They also do this to imacs. Great screens but they put in graphics cards that are too slow for good fps games.
They also do this to imacs. Great screens but they put in graphics cards that are too slow for good fps games.
They also do this to imacs. Great screens but they put in graphics cards that are too slow for good fps games.
They also do this to imacs. Great screens but they put in graphics cards that are too slow for good fps games.
They also do this to imacs. Great screens but they put in graphics cards that are too slow for good fps games.
They also do this to imacs. Great screens but they put in graphics cards that are too slow for good fps games.
LOL..
Part of it is the resolution…
LOL..
Part of it is the resolution…
LOL..
Part of it is the resolution…
LOL..
Part of it is the resolution…
As if I needed another reason to get the EVO 3D!!!
As if I needed another reason to get the EVO 3D!!!
As if I needed another reason to get the EVO 3D!!!
As if I needed another reason to get the EVO 3D!!!
As if I needed another reason to get the EVO 3D!!!
As if I needed another reason to get the EVO 3D!!!
@&*$#^%Q&^*@$#&(*@!&#()(*)(#@@!^&#!^*@&
=O
Can’t wait to get mah Evo 3D now! Funny, cuz I thought the talk was Qualcomm’s dual-core was supposed to be the slowest out of the bunch cuz of the weak Adreno GPU.
Guess not? =)
@&*$#^%Q&^*@$#&(*@!&#()(*)(#@@!^&#!^*@&
=O
Can’t wait to get mah Evo 3D now! Funny, cuz I thought the talk was Qualcomm’s dual-core was supposed to be the slowest out of the bunch cuz of the weak Adreno GPU.
Guess not? =)
@&*$#^%Q&^*@$#&(*@!&#()(*)(#@@!^&#!^*@&
=O
Can’t wait to get mah Evo 3D now! Funny, cuz I thought the talk was Qualcomm’s dual-core was supposed to be the slowest out of the bunch cuz of the weak Adreno GPU.
Guess not? =)
@&*$#^%Q&^*@$#&(*@!&#()(*)(#@@!^&#!^*@&
=O
Can’t wait to get mah Evo 3D now! Funny, cuz I thought the talk was Qualcomm’s dual-core was supposed to be the slowest out of the bunch cuz of the weak Adreno GPU.
Guess not? =)
@&*$#^%Q&^*@$#&(*@!&#()(*)(#@@!^&#!^*@&
=O
Can’t wait to get mah Evo 3D now! Funny, cuz I thought the talk was Qualcomm’s dual-core was supposed to be the slowest out of the bunch cuz of the weak Adreno GPU.
Guess not? =)
@&*$#^%Q&^*@$#&(*@!&#()(*)(#@@!^&#!^*@&
=O
Can’t wait to get mah Evo 3D now! Funny, cuz I thought the talk was Qualcomm’s dual-core was supposed to be the slowest out of the bunch cuz of the weak Adreno GPU.
Guess not? =)
FINALLY!! Looks like Qualcomm wasnt too happy coming up short in benchmarks.
FINALLY!! Looks like Qualcomm wasnt too happy coming up short in benchmarks.
FINALLY!! Looks like Qualcomm wasnt too happy coming up short in benchmarks.
FINALLY!! Looks like Qualcomm wasnt too happy coming up short in benchmarks.
FINALLY!! Looks like Qualcomm wasnt too happy coming up short in benchmarks.
FINALLY!! Looks like Qualcomm wasnt too happy coming up short in benchmarks.
Ha! Your 1 ghz is for NOOBS
Sorry. :)
Ha! Your 1 ghz is for NOOBS
Sorry. :)
Ha! Your 1 ghz is for NOOBS
Sorry. :)
Ha! Your 1 ghz is for NOOBS
Sorry. :)
Ha! Your 1 ghz is for NOOBS
Sorry. :)
Ha! Your 1 ghz is for NOOBS
Sorry. :)
WOAH! I honestly wasnt expecting this kind of performance from Qualcomm especially seeing as how snapdragon last year was one of the slower ones (albeit still a good one imo)..but man am i glad to see it beating the competition…by a good percentage to…man am i glad im on sprint :). Evo 3d FTW
WOAH! I honestly wasnt expecting this kind of performance from Qualcomm especially seeing as how snapdragon last year was one of the slower ones (albeit still a good one imo)..but man am i glad to see it beating the competition…by a good percentage to…man am i glad im on sprint :). Evo 3d FTW
WOAH! I honestly wasnt expecting this kind of performance from Qualcomm especially seeing as how snapdragon last year was one of the slower ones (albeit still a good one imo)..but man am i glad to see it beating the competition…by a good percentage to…man am i glad im on sprint :). Evo 3d FTW
WOAH! I honestly wasnt expecting this kind of performance from Qualcomm especially seeing as how snapdragon last year was one of the slower ones (albeit still a good one imo)..but man am i glad to see it beating the competition…by a good percentage to…man am i glad im on sprint :). Evo 3d FTW
WOAH! I honestly wasnt expecting this kind of performance from Qualcomm especially seeing as how snapdragon last year was one of the slower ones (albeit still a good one imo)..but man am i glad to see it beating the competition…by a good percentage to…man am i glad im on sprint :). Evo 3d FTW
WOAH! I honestly wasnt expecting this kind of performance from Qualcomm especially seeing as how snapdragon last year was one of the slower ones (albeit still a good one imo)..but man am i glad to see it beating the competition…by a good percentage to…man am i glad im on sprint :). Evo 3d FTW
This unreal to see a phone have that much power! Can’t wait tel the end of the year to see what phones can do!
This unreal to see a phone have that much power! Can’t wait tel the end of the year to see what phones can do!
This unreal to see a phone have that much power! Can’t wait tel the end of the year to see what phones can do!
This unreal to see a phone have that much power! Can’t wait tel the end of the year to see what phones can do!
This unreal to see a phone have that much power! Can’t wait tel the end of the year to see what phones can do!
This unreal to see a phone have that much power! Can’t wait tel the end of the year to see what phones can do!
I’ll believe all of this when the phone actually comes out…. It’s oh this processor sucks and now it’s oh this processor dominates
We shall see
I’ll believe all of this when the phone actually comes out…. It’s oh this processor sucks and now it’s oh this processor dominates
We shall see
I’ll believe all of this when the phone actually comes out…. It’s oh this processor sucks and now it’s oh this processor dominates
We shall see
I’ll believe all of this when the phone actually comes out…. It’s oh this processor sucks and now it’s oh this processor dominates
We shall see
I’ll believe all of this when the phone actually comes out…. It’s oh this processor sucks and now it’s oh this processor dominates
We shall see
I’ll believe all of this when the phone actually comes out…. It’s oh this processor sucks and now it’s oh this processor dominates
We shall see
iphone 3gs outperformed iphone4?
iphone 3gs outperformed iphone4?
Cause of the screen
Cause of the screen
iphone 3gs outperformed iphone4?
iphone 3gs outperformed iphone4?
iphone 3gs outperformed iphone4?
iphone 3gs outperformed iphone4?
These test are from MDP devices clocked @ 1.5GHz, lets see how the EVO 3D @ 1.2GHz in the real world compares before we start handing the crown to Qualcom.
Either way, looks like I won’t need to stick with a Tegra-based device if Qualcomm are delivering on performance.
These test are from MDP devices clocked @ 1.5GHz, lets see how the EVO 3D @ 1.2GHz in the real world compares before we start handing the crown to Qualcom.
Either way, looks like I won’t need to stick with a Tegra-based device if Qualcomm are delivering on performance.
These test are from MDP devices clocked @ 1.5GHz, lets see how the EVO 3D @ 1.2GHz in the real world compares before we start handing the crown to Qualcom.
Either way, looks like I won’t need to stick with a Tegra-based device if Qualcomm are delivering on performance.
These test are from MDP devices clocked @ 1.5GHz, lets see how the EVO 3D @ 1.2GHz in the real world compares before we start handing the crown to Qualcom.
Either way, looks like I won’t need to stick with a Tegra-based device if Qualcomm are delivering on performance.
These test are from MDP devices clocked @ 1.5GHz, lets see how the EVO 3D @ 1.2GHz in the real world compares before we start handing the crown to Qualcom.
Either way, looks like I won’t need to stick with a Tegra-based device if Qualcomm are delivering on performance.
These test are from MDP devices clocked @ 1.5GHz, lets see how the EVO 3D @ 1.2GHz in the real world compares before we start handing the crown to Qualcom.
Either way, looks like I won’t need to stick with a Tegra-based device if Qualcomm are delivering on performance.
The Htc Evo3d has already been proven everyone on the floor at CTIA was truly impressed with the speed and fluidity of the device not to mention the overall technology that exist in this one device. The only thing I wanted was the NFC technology in the device that’s what’s missing but gingerbread will bring that ability to this device. People on sprint should be very proud of what we are about to get our hands on in the coming days. This device is a reflection of great business relationships and overall commitment to the Evo Brand on sprint nothing on any other carrier will compare for the remainder of 2011.. I want to give Samsung credit with there S2 this year but more so there upcoming 1.4 hummingbird processor that will appear in there next device… HTC EVO 3D WILL RULE ANDROID and further place sprint FIRMLY ON THE ANDROID MAP people can HATE all they want and trust me many haters exist on this site no matter is said NO OTHER CARRIER WILL HAVE ANYTHING BETTER THAN THIS DEVICE.. Not the thunderbolt, not the Droid Bionic, Not any device on Verizon or At&t.
The Htc Evo3d has already been proven everyone on the floor at CTIA was truly impressed with the speed and fluidity of the device not to mention the overall technology that exist in this one device. The only thing I wanted was the NFC technology in the device that’s what’s missing but gingerbread will bring that ability to this device. People on sprint should be very proud of what we are about to get our hands on in the coming days. This device is a reflection of great business relationships and overall commitment to the Evo Brand on sprint nothing on any other carrier will compare for the remainder of 2011.. I want to give Samsung credit with there S2 this year but more so there upcoming 1.4 hummingbird processor that will appear in there next device… HTC EVO 3D WILL RULE ANDROID and further place sprint FIRMLY ON THE ANDROID MAP people can HATE all they want and trust me many haters exist on this site no matter is said NO OTHER CARRIER WILL HAVE ANYTHING BETTER THAN THIS DEVICE.. Not the thunderbolt, not the Droid Bionic, Not any device on Verizon or At&t.
Are you working for Sprint? This test was done with MDP device clocked at 1.5Ghz while others are loaded with manufacturer bloatwares, skins, clocked at 1Ghz. Real performance of Evo 3D @1.2Ghz won’t be this high for sure. Also why Exynos for SGS2 is missing here?
If you didn’t know, Tegra2-3D, Tegra3, OMAP4440 (1.5Ghz) are all due to be out soon with much faster graphic performance than tegra2. So even adreno220 topping this chart won’t stay long.
Tegra 2 3d is not much improvement, the tegra 3 will be. But so will the adreno 300. And so on and so on. Can’t wait till we actually start flexing the muscles of these SOC’s and I don’t mean angry birds. Playstation 2 emulators? Xbox 1 emulators?
Yeah, but Tegra 3 should come out before this chip..and it has double the processing power and probably at least 50% bigger graphics performance.
Yeah, but Tegra 3 should come out before this chip..and it has double the processing power and probably at least 50% bigger graphics performance.
Tegra 2 3d is not much improvement, the tegra 3 will be. But so will the adreno 300. And so on and so on. Can’t wait till we actually start flexing the muscles of these SOC’s and I don’t mean angry birds. Playstation 2 emulators? Xbox 1 emulators?
We shall see my friend today Htc Evo3d and Sprint rules period
We shall see my friend today Htc Evo3d and Sprint rules period
We shall see my friend today Htc Evo3d and Sprint rules period
We shall see my friend today Htc Evo3d and Sprint rules period
Are you working for Sprint? This test was done with MDP device clocked at 1.5Ghz while others are loaded with manufacturer bloatwares, skins, clocked at 1Ghz. Real performance of Evo 3D @1.2Ghz won’t be this high for sure. Also why Exynos for SGS2 is missing here?
If you didn’t know, Tegra2-3D, Tegra3, OMAP4440 (1.5Ghz) are all due to be out soon with much faster graphic performance than tegra2. So even adreno220 topping this chart won’t stay long.
This is all well and good until you put the Exynos on there. The fact that last year’s single core Hummingbird is running a close 4th means that the new dual core CPU quad core GPU Exynos from Samsung is going to spank the Snapdragon in 2011 just like the Hummingbird did in 2010.
LOL not surprised the Samsung Galaxy S II isn’t on here. Fanboys lol
This is all well and good until you put the Exynos on there. The fact that last year’s single core Hummingbird is running a close 4th means that the new dual core CPU quad core GPU Exynos from Samsung is going to spank the Snapdragon in 2011 just like the Hummingbird did in 2010.
LOL not surprised the Samsung Galaxy S II isn’t on here. Fanboys lol
You’re comparing apples to grapes here. Reason is because you’re comparing a 1.5ghz chipset to 1 ghz chipsets.
Let’s see how the MSM8660 does at 1ghz to the Tegra 2 or them both running at 1.5ghz. And being that Qualcomm is using A8 vs A9 instruction set and using 45nm vs 40nm on the chips, It’ll probably suck up more juice.
I’m not saying the new Qualcomm SoC’s can’t give a great user experience, but I doubt they are fast or more power efficient then the other dual core chipsets when you compare cycle for cycle.
BTW, unless the EVO 3D has an NFC chip, there’s no way it’s going to be activated with Gingerbread. It also already has Gingerbread.
You’re comparing apples to grapes here. Reason is because you’re comparing a 1.5ghz chipset to 1 ghz chipsets.
Let’s see how the MSM8660 does at 1ghz to the Tegra 2 or them both running at 1.5ghz. And being that Qualcomm is using A8 vs A9 instruction set and using 45nm vs 40nm on the chips, It’ll probably suck up more juice.
I’m not saying the new Qualcomm SoC’s can’t give a great user experience, but I doubt they are fast or more power efficient then the other dual core chipsets when you compare cycle for cycle.
BTW, unless the EVO 3D has an NFC chip, there’s no way it’s going to be activated with Gingerbread. It also already has Gingerbread.
You’re comparing apples to grapes here. Reason is because you’re comparing a 1.5ghz chipset to 1 ghz chipsets.
Let’s see how the MSM8660 does at 1ghz to the Tegra 2 or them both running at 1.5ghz. And being that Qualcomm is using A8 vs A9 instruction set and using 45nm vs 40nm on the chips, It’ll probably suck up more juice.
I’m not saying the new Qualcomm SoC’s can’t give a great user experience, but I doubt they are fast or more power efficient then the other dual core chipsets when you compare cycle for cycle.
BTW, unless the EVO 3D has an NFC chip, there’s no way it’s going to be activated with Gingerbread. It also already has Gingerbread.
You’re comparing apples to grapes here. Reason is because you’re comparing a 1.5ghz chipset to 1 ghz chipsets.
Let’s see how the MSM8660 does at 1ghz to the Tegra 2 or them both running at 1.5ghz. And being that Qualcomm is using A8 vs A9 instruction set and using 45nm vs 40nm on the chips, It’ll probably suck up more juice.
I’m not saying the new Qualcomm SoC’s can’t give a great user experience, but I doubt they are fast or more power efficient then the other dual core chipsets when you compare cycle for cycle.
BTW, unless the EVO 3D has an NFC chip, there’s no way it’s going to be activated with Gingerbread. It also already has Gingerbread.
Tetgras are old chips, not worth it, they were embarrassed by the iPad.
Tetgras are old chips, not worth it, they were embarrassed by the iPad.
The 1.2 Ghz dual core chip will be out before Tegra 3, but Tegra 3 should be out before this chip, and it’s not even competition. Tegra 3 will be almost twice as good in both CPU and GPU.
What most people don’t realize is that Tegra 2 actually started shipping 7 months ago (in September last year)…so even the 1.2 Ghz dual core Snapdragon is 8-9 months late compared to Tegra 2 (although a bit more powerful GPU wise, CPU about the same).
The 1.2 Ghz dual core chip will be out before Tegra 3, but Tegra 3 should be out before this chip, and it’s not even competition. Tegra 3 will be almost twice as good in both CPU and GPU.
What most people don’t realize is that Tegra 2 actually started shipping 7 months ago (in September last year)…so even the 1.2 Ghz dual core Snapdragon is 8-9 months late compared to Tegra 2 (although a bit more powerful GPU wise, CPU about the same).
This is all well and good until you put the Exynos on there. The fact that last year’s single core Hummingbird is running a close 4th means that the new dual core CPU quad core GPU Exynos is going to spank the Snapdragon in 2011 just like the Hummingbird did in 2010.
This is all well and good until you put the Exynos on there. The fact that last year’s single core Hummingbird is running a close 4th means that the new dual core CPU quad core GPU Exynos is going to spank the Snapdragon in 2011 just like the Hummingbird did in 2010.
This is all well and good until you put the Exynos on there. The fact that last year’s single core Hummingbird is running a close 4th means that the new dual core CPU quad core GPU Exynos is going to spank the Snapdragon in 2011 just like the Hummingbird did in 2010.
This is all well and good until you put the Exynos on there. The fact that last year’s single core Hummingbird is running a close 4th means that the new dual core CPU quad core GPU Exynos is going to spank the Snapdragon in 2011 just like the Hummingbird did in 2010.
Maybe maybe not since apple bought entrincity who worked on both Apple’s a4 chip and Sammy’s hummingbird
Maybe maybe not since apple bought entrincity who worked on both Apple’s a4 chip and Sammy’s hummingbird
Sounds good but highly doubtful. Let’s see what samsung will through out there. Right now the Htc Evo3d will be the best in every way followed by the Lg Optimus 3d clearly the top two devices.
Sounds good but highly doubtful. Let’s see what samsung will through out there. Right now the Htc Evo3d will be the best in every way followed by the Lg Optimus 3d clearly the top two devices.
Sounds good but highly doubtful. Let’s see what samsung will through out there. Right now the Htc Evo3d will be the best in every way followed by the Lg Optimus 3d clearly the top two devices.
Sounds good but highly doubtful. Let’s see what samsung will through out there. Right now the Htc Evo3d will be the best in every way followed by the Lg Optimus 3d clearly the top two devices.
This is all well and good until you put the Exynos on there. The fact that last year’s single core Hummingbird is running a close 4th means that the new dual core CPU quad core GPU Exynos is going to spank the Snapdragon in 2011 just like the Hummingbird did in 2010.
This is all well and good until you put the Exynos on there. The fact that last year’s single core Hummingbird is running a close 4th means that the new dual core CPU quad core GPU Exynos is going to spank the Snapdragon in 2011 just like the Hummingbird did in 2010.
Evo 3d. Something better in 2months after release date.
Evo 3d. Something better in 2months after release date.
Evo 3d. Something better in 2months after release date.
Evo 3d. Something better in 2months after release date.
Evo 3d. Something better in 2months after release date.
Good for consumers, of android fans that is, apple fans sit on the side line and cry, till next years new slight incremental model.
Good for consumers, of android fans that is, apple fans sit on the side line and cry, till next years new slight incremental model.
Nothing will be better in 2011 my friend. Don’t hate participate in purchasing this monster. You may learn something
Nothing will be better in 2011 my friend. Don’t hate participate in purchasing this monster. You may learn something
Nothing will be better in 2011 my friend. Don’t hate participate in purchasing this monster. You may learn something
Nothing will be better in 2011 my friend. Don’t hate participate in purchasing this monster. You may learn something
Evo 3d. Something better in 2months after release date.
This test is one sided for qualcomm 8660 since it’s clocked at 1.5Ghz while others are at 1.0Ghz. If you scale the performance of Tegra2, OMAP4 to 1.5Ghz, they are still faster.
This test is one sided for qualcomm 8660 since it’s clocked at 1.5Ghz while others are at 1.0Ghz. If you scale the performance of Tegra2, OMAP4 to 1.5Ghz, they are still faster.
as I’m sure the Qualcomm’s could be further clocked as well.
as I’m sure the Qualcomm’s could be further clocked as well.
as I’m sure the Qualcomm’s could be further clocked as well.
as I’m sure the Qualcomm’s could be further clocked as well.
as I’m sure the Qualcomm’s could be further clocked as well.
as I’m sure the Qualcomm’s could be further clocked as well.
So are others. Even Hummingbird was able to clock at 1.9Ghz with rooting. My point is that 8660 is not faster at the same clock.
So are others. Even Hummingbird was able to clock at 1.9Ghz with rooting. My point is that 8660 is not faster at the same clock.
Intel proved that the ability to push out the gigahertz is more important than IPC. That’s why Apple had to dump powerpc for Intel.
Intel proved that the ability to push out the gigahertz is more important than IPC. That’s why Apple had to dump powerpc for Intel.
That was old days of Pentium4. But they couldn’t keep doing that as power consumption sky rocketed with clock. So they came back to focusing on IPC like Core 2 duo, i5, etc. So that argument being able to clock higher is better is not valid any more.
That was old days of Pentium4. But they couldn’t keep doing that as power consumption sky rocketed with clock. So they came back to focusing on IPC like Core 2 duo, i5, etc. So that argument being able to clock higher is better is not valid any more.
This is the complete opposite of what actually happened
This is the complete opposite of what actually happened
This is the complete opposite of what actually happened
This is the complete opposite of what actually happened
So are others. Even Hummingbird was able to clock at 1.9Ghz with rooting. My point is that 8660 is not faster at the same clock.
So are others. Even Hummingbird was able to clock at 1.9Ghz with rooting. My point is that 8660 is not faster at the same clock.
So are others. Even Hummingbird was able to clock at 1.9Ghz with rooting. My point is that 8660 is not faster at the same clock.
So are others. Even Hummingbird was able to clock at 1.9Ghz with rooting. My point is that 8660 is not faster at the same clock.
thing is Qualcomm already has a 1.5 ghz chip (note: not this dual core version) in the production ready HTC Flyer.
thing is Qualcomm already has a 1.5 ghz chip (note: not this dual core version) in the production ready HTC Flyer.
This test is one sided for qualcomm 8660 since it’s clocked at 1.5Ghz while others are at 1.0Ghz. If you scale the performance of Tegra2, OMAP4 to 1.5Ghz, they are still faster.
This test is one sided for qualcomm 8660 since it’s clocked at 1.5Ghz while others are at 1.0Ghz. If you scale the performance of Tegra2, OMAP4 to 1.5Ghz, they are still faster.
This test is one sided for qualcomm 8660 since it’s clocked at 1.5Ghz while others are at 1.0Ghz. If you scale the performance of Tegra2, OMAP4 to 1.5Ghz, they are still faster.
This test is one sided for qualcomm 8660 since it’s clocked at 1.5Ghz while others are at 1.0Ghz. If you scale the performance of Tegra2, OMAP4 to 1.5Ghz, they are still faster.
I’d like to know where all the talkers are about Qualcomm now… Every time you turned around some fanboy of Tegra 2 was on there soap box talking smack… NOW TALK… People on the floor at CTIA was most impressed with the Htc Evo3d’s speed and how the device operated and that was not a finished product software wise so i know when launched this device will be the BEST ON THE MARKET. As far as the Htc Flyer is concerned this is something I will definitely pick up after I get my Htc Evo3d on day one. Who knows i might pick up both of them on day one of picking up my Evo3d. Bottom line here i never put stock in benchmarks I care most about real world USAGE and that is where the ORIGINAL HTC EVO 4G KILLED ALL DEVICES. In reality htc understands not only what there customers want but exactly the daily experience they need from there smartphones NOBODY WILL EVER BE BETTER THAN THEM. I am glad they stick to there business partners and the relationships they have with those partners Htc and Sprint benefit from Qualcomm and apparently so does the Play Station Phone…
I’d like to know where all the talkers are about Qualcomm now… Every time you turned around some fanboy of Tegra 2 was on there soap box talking smack… NOW TALK… People on the floor at CTIA was most impressed with the Htc Evo3d’s speed and how the device operated and that was not a finished product software wise so i know when launched this device will be the BEST ON THE MARKET. As far as the Htc Flyer is concerned this is something I will definitely pick up after I get my Htc Evo3d on day one. Who knows i might pick up both of them on day one of picking up my Evo3d. Bottom line here i never put stock in benchmarks I care most about real world USAGE and that is where the ORIGINAL HTC EVO 4G KILLED ALL DEVICES. In reality htc understands not only what there customers want but exactly the daily experience they need from there smartphones NOBODY WILL EVER BE BETTER THAN THEM. I am glad they stick to there business partners and the relationships they have with those partners Htc and Sprint benefit from Qualcomm and apparently so does the Play Station Phone…
I’d like to know where all the talkers are about Qualcomm now… Every time you turned around some fanboy of Tegra 2 was on there soap box talking smack… NOW TALK… People on the floor at CTIA was most impressed with the Htc Evo3d’s speed and how the device operated and that was not a finished product software wise so i know when launched this device will be the BEST ON THE MARKET. As far as the Htc Flyer is concerned this is something I will definitely pick up after I get my Htc Evo3d on day one. Who knows i might pick up both of them on day one of picking up my Evo3d. Bottom line here i never put stock in benchmarks I care most about real world USAGE and that is where the ORIGINAL HTC EVO 4G KILLED ALL DEVICES. In reality htc understands not only what there customers want but exactly the daily experience they need from there smartphones NOBODY WILL EVER BE BETTER THAN THEM. I am glad they stick to there business partners and the relationships they have with those partners Htc and Sprint benefit from Qualcomm and apparently so does the Play Station Phone…
I’d like to know where all the talkers are about Qualcomm now… Every time you turned around some fanboy of Tegra 2 was on there soap box talking smack… NOW TALK… People on the floor at CTIA was most impressed with the Htc Evo3d’s speed and how the device operated and that was not a finished product software wise so i know when launched this device will be the BEST ON THE MARKET. As far as the Htc Flyer is concerned this is something I will definitely pick up after I get my Htc Evo3d on day one. Who knows i might pick up both of them on day one of picking up my Evo3d. Bottom line here i never put stock in benchmarks I care most about real world USAGE and that is where the ORIGINAL HTC EVO 4G KILLED ALL DEVICES. In reality htc understands not only what there customers want but exactly the daily experience they need from there smartphones NOBODY WILL EVER BE BETTER THAN THEM. I am glad they stick to there business partners and the relationships they have with those partners Htc and Sprint benefit from Qualcomm and apparently so does the Play Station Phone…
the tagra 2 overclocked at 1.5 in the xoom get 3250 benchmark, so easy qualcomm fanboys
Hummingbird clocked at 1.5 Ghz single core gets 4500.
Problems?
Isn’t Orion supposed to be 5X faster than Hummingbird processor?
Isn’t Orion supposed to be 5X faster than Hummingbird processor?
Isn’t Orion supposed to be 5X faster than Hummingbird processor?
Isn’t Orion supposed to be 5X faster than Hummingbird processor?
Hummingbird clocked at 1.5 Ghz single core gets 4500.
Problems?
the tagra 2 overclocked at 1.5 in the xoom get 3250 benchmark, so easy qualcomm fanboys
All the games will be optimized for Tegra 2 because of higher popularity.
End of dicussion.
All the games will be optimized for Tegra 2 because of higher popularity.
End of dicussion.
Higher popularity according to who or what??? Tegra 2 what’s so special about them???
90% of android tablet will go out with Tegra 2.
Only HTC and half samsung chosen other SoC.
90% of android tablet will go out with Tegra 2.
Only HTC and half samsung chosen other SoC.
90% of android tablet will go out with Tegra 2.
Only HTC and half samsung chosen other SoC.
90% of android tablet will go out with Tegra 2.
Only HTC and half samsung chosen other SoC.
Please put the Kool-aid down!!!!! And, this is coming from a 10yr Sprint customer. To say that the EVO 3D will be the best phone for the whole year is a little far fetched. But, if you choose to continue being a cheerleader then by all mean so right ahead……
Please put the Kool-aid down!!!!! And, this is coming from a 10yr Sprint customer. To say that the EVO 3D will be the best phone for the whole year is a little far fetched. But, if you choose to continue being a cheerleader then by all mean so right ahead……
Please put the Kool-aid down!!!!! And, this is coming from a 10yr Sprint customer. To say that the EVO 3D will be the best phone for the whole year is a little far fetched. But, if you choose to continue being a cheerleader then by all mean so right ahead……
Please put the Kool-aid down!!!!! And, this is coming from a 10yr Sprint customer. To say that the EVO 3D will be the best phone for the whole year is a little far fetched. But, if you choose to continue being a cheerleader then by all mean so right ahead……
I’d like to know where all the talkers are about Qualcomm now… Every time you turned around some fanboy of Tegra 2 was on there soap box talking smack… NOW TALK… People on the floor at CTIA was most impressed with the Htc Evo3d’s speed and how the device operated and that was not a finished product software wise so i know when launched this device will be the BEST ON THE MARKET. As far as the Htc Flyer is concerned this is something I will definitely pick up after I get my Htc Evo3d on day one. Who knows i might pick up both of them on day one of picking up my Evo3d. Bottom line here i never put stock in benchmarks I care most about real world USAGE and that is where the ORIGINAL HTC EVO 4G KILLED ALL DEVICES. In reality htc understands not only what there customers want but exactly the daily experience they need from there smartphones NOBODY WILL EVER BE BETTER THAN THEM. I am glad they stick to there business partners and the relationships they have with those partners Htc and Sprint benefit from Qualcomm and apparently so does the Play Station Phone…
I’d like to know where all the talkers are about Qualcomm now… Every time you turned around some fanboy of Tegra 2 was on there soap box talking smack… NOW TALK… People on the floor at CTIA was most impressed with the Htc Evo3d’s speed and how the device operated and that was not a finished product software wise so i know when launched this device will be the BEST ON THE MARKET. As far as the Htc Flyer is concerned this is something I will definitely pick up after I get my Htc Evo3d on day one. Who knows i might pick up both of them on day one of picking up my Evo3d. Bottom line here i never put stock in benchmarks I care most about real world USAGE and that is where the ORIGINAL HTC EVO 4G KILLED ALL DEVICES. In reality htc understands not only what there customers want but exactly the daily experience they need from there smartphones NOBODY WILL EVER BE BETTER THAN THEM. I am glad they stick to there business partners and the relationships they have with those partners Htc and Sprint benefit from Qualcomm and apparently so does the Play Station Phone…
The iPhone 3gs is faster than the iPhone 4!!!
Cause of the high res screen
Cause of the high res screen
Its a graphics benchmark and the 2 phones have the same GPU. Difference is, the 3GS has a much lower res.
Its a graphics benchmark and the 2 phones have the same GPU. Difference is, the 3GS has a much lower res.
Its a graphics benchmark and the 2 phones have the same GPU. Difference is, the 3GS has a much lower res.
Its a graphics benchmark and the 2 phones have the same GPU. Difference is, the 3GS has a much lower res.
The iPhone 3gs is faster than the iPhone 4!!!
Without the games iphone has, who cares what our cpu’s can do. Until google can fix all the frag for developers, the snapdragon is fine, we cant do nothing with a badass chipset,sucks
It has on live. Google is working on fragmentation. Problem will be solved soon enough.
I happen to think the Adreno 200 was one of the major reasons why we didn’t have good games on Android until very late in the game when other manufacturers joined the Android party with other chips, along with the fact that HTC was “cheap” enough to use only 200 MB of free internal storage for apps, which meant that all games over 5 MB or so were “too big”, and people wouldn’t keep them in their phones for long or would yell at developers because they are “so big”.
I happen to think the Adreno 200 was one of the major reasons why we didn’t have good games on Android until very late in the game when other manufacturers joined the Android party with other chips, along with the fact that HTC was “cheap” enough to use only 200 MB of free internal storage for apps, which meant that all games over 5 MB or so were “too big”, and people wouldn’t keep them in their phones for long or would yell at developers because they are “so big”.
Without the games iphone has, who cares what our cpu’s can do. Until google can fix all the frag for developers, the snapdragon is fine, we cant do nothing with a badass chipset,sucks
or webos….. they have rocking games.
or webos….. they have rocking games.
This behcmark prefers adreno chips.
It made the Adreno 205 look stronger than the SGX 540, but its not even close.
Use a proper benchmark like Nenamark.
This behcmark prefers adreno chips.
It made the Adreno 205 look stronger than the SGX 540, but its not even close.
Use a proper benchmark like Nenamark.
So the iPhone 3Gs is faster than the iPhone 4 according to this Benchmark.
Yes, because they use the same GPU but iPhone 4 pushes 4x as many pixels on the screen. It’s too bad so many people are just now realizing this, though I still think I’d prefer a higher resolution (especially on a tablet) over a hit in performance, unless the performance hit is too big.
Yes, because they use the same GPU but iPhone 4 pushes 4x as many pixels on the screen. It’s too bad so many people are just now realizing this, though I still think I’d prefer a higher resolution (especially on a tablet) over a hit in performance, unless the performance hit is too big.
So the iPhone 3Gs is faster than the iPhone 4 according to this Benchmark.
Wow, this just shows how powerful the Omap processor in the Optimus 3D really is!
It’s quite obvious that the OMAP outperforms the Snapdragon when clocked the same.
Imagine the benchmarks when the Optimus 3D is overclocked that high!
Wow, this just shows how powerful the Omap processor in the Optimus 3D really is!
It’s quite obvious that the OMAP outperforms the Snapdragon when clocked the same.
Imagine the benchmarks when the Optimus 3D is overclocked that high!
This chip will not be out until end of the year.
This chip will not be out until end of the year.
Evo 3d is set to be released in June.
Evo 3d is set to be released in June.
Evo 3d is set to be released in June.
Does it have this 1.5 Ghz dual core chip?
Does it have this 1.5 Ghz dual core chip?
Does it have this 1.5 Ghz dual core chip?
Does it have this 1.5 Ghz dual core chip?
Evo 3d is set to be released in June.
Good preocessor…. beaten all of them…Quite interesting…
Good preocessor…. beaten all of them…Quite interesting…
Hahaha Iphone 4 is where it belongs
Hahaha Iphone 4 is where it belongs
Hahaha Iphone 4 is where it belongs
Hahaha Iphone 4 is where it belongs
Will this chipset support Netflix?
Will this chipset support Netflix?
Will this chipset support Netflix?
Will this chipset support Netflix?
qualcomm also going to allow netflix
qualcomm also going to allow netflix
qualcomm also going to allow netflix
qualcomm also going to allow netflix
I’m happy about this news, as I absolutely love HTC phones, and with their decision to stick with Qualcomm, it just makes things even better.
According to this the Fascinate is faster than the Atrix? That makes me question my interest in the Bionic..
According to this the Fascinate is faster than the Atrix? That makes me question my interest in the Bionic..
According to this the Fascinate is faster than the Atrix? That makes me question my interest in the Bionic..
Screen res, screen res..
Thats why the iPhone 4 is way at the bottom vs. other phones from last year.
Screen res, screen res..
Thats why the iPhone 4 is way at the bottom vs. other phones from last year.
Screen res, screen res..
Thats why the iPhone 4 is way at the bottom vs. other phones from last year.
Screen res, screen res..
Thats why the iPhone 4 is way at the bottom vs. other phones from last year.
Screen res, screen res..
Thats why the iPhone 4 is way at the bottom vs. other phones from last year.
Screen res, screen res..
Thats why the iPhone 4 is way at the bottom vs. other phones from last year.
According to this the Fascinate is faster than the Atrix? That makes me question my interest in the Bionic..
You all realize that the benchmarks these phones are tested with are largely invalid, don’t you?
By the time new games and applications are going to be developed, there might be proper comparisons between the chips.
Quadrant is the worst benchmark out there. I can set up my Acer Liquid (1st gen Snapdragon (with Adreno 200) running 768MHz) to do a better Quadrant score than a stock Galaxy S. And of course the Liquid is NOT faster than the SGS except in calculating Pi.
Quadrant is completely invalid.
Tegra2 uses the GeForce ULV GPU which handles graphical output somewhat different than the other mobile GPUs out there. It works rather like a desktop GPU in the way it renders graphics, while the Power VR SGX GPUs (in the Hummingbirds, A4, A5 and OMAPs) spit out plain pixels and triangles.
The Adreno 205 is 5x as fast as the Adreno 200 and is about as fast as the Power VR SGX540 in the SGS.
Qualcomm claims that the Adreno 220 would be 5x as fast as the Adreno 205.
I hope that the Adreno 22x chips will be able to render graphics in a sophisticated way and will be available in the near future.
There is a reason why Sony Ericsson puts an Adreno 205 in its Xperia Play.
There is a reason why tons of game developers port their console titles to the Tegra2.
Their analysts surely came across these lacking benchmarks presented in this article, and they still decided to port their titles to Adreno 205 and Tegra2 over Hummingbird and OMAP.
I think with the Adreno 220 it is going to be the same. I see a Xperia Play 2 comming.
You all realize that the benchmarks these phones are tested with are largely invalid, don’t you?
By the time new games and applications are going to be developed, there might be proper comparisons between the chips.
Quadrant is the worst benchmark out there. I can set up my Acer Liquid (1st gen Snapdragon (with Adreno 200) running 768MHz) to do a better Quadrant score than a stock Galaxy S. And of course the Liquid is NOT faster than the SGS except in calculating Pi.
Quadrant is completely invalid.
Tegra2 uses the GeForce ULV GPU which handles graphical output somewhat different than the other mobile GPUs out there. It works rather like a desktop GPU in the way it renders graphics, while the Power VR SGX GPUs (in the Hummingbirds, A4, A5 and OMAPs) spit out plain pixels and triangles.
The Adreno 205 is 5x as fast as the Adreno 200 and is about as fast as the Power VR SGX540 in the SGS.
Qualcomm claims that the Adreno 220 would be 5x as fast as the Adreno 205.
I hope that the Adreno 22x chips will be able to render graphics in a sophisticated way and will be available in the near future.
There is a reason why Sony Ericsson puts an Adreno 205 in its Xperia Play.
There is a reason why tons of game developers port their console titles to the Tegra2.
Their analysts surely came across these lacking benchmarks presented in this article, and they still decided to port their titles to Adreno 205 and Tegra2 over Hummingbird and OMAP.
I think with the Adreno 220 it is going to be the same. I see a Xperia Play 2 comming.
You all realize that the benchmarks these phones are tested with are largely invalid, don’t you?
By the time new games and applications are going to be developed, there might be proper comparisons between the chips.
Quadrant is the worst benchmark out there. I can set up my Acer Liquid (1st gen Snapdragon (with Adreno 200) running 768MHz) to do a better Quadrant score than a stock Galaxy S. And of course the Liquid is NOT faster than the SGS except in calculating Pi.
Quadrant is completely invalid.
Tegra2 uses the GeForce ULV GPU which handles graphical output somewhat different than the other mobile GPUs out there. It works rather like a desktop GPU in the way it renders graphics, while the Power VR SGX GPUs (in the Hummingbirds, A4, A5 and OMAPs) spit out plain pixels and triangles.
The Adreno 205 is 5x as fast as the Adreno 200 and is about as fast as the Power VR SGX540 in the SGS.
Qualcomm claims that the Adreno 220 would be 5x as fast as the Adreno 205.
I hope that the Adreno 22x chips will be able to render graphics in a sophisticated way and will be available in the near future.
There is a reason why Sony Ericsson puts an Adreno 205 in its Xperia Play.
There is a reason why tons of game developers port their console titles to the Tegra2.
Their analysts surely came across these lacking benchmarks presented in this article, and they still decided to port their titles to Adreno 205 and Tegra2 over Hummingbird and OMAP.
I think with the Adreno 220 it is going to be the same. I see a Xperia Play 2 comming.
You all realize that the benchmarks these phones are tested with are largely invalid, don’t you?
By the time new games and applications are going to be developed, there might be proper comparisons between the chips.
Quadrant is the worst benchmark out there. I can set up my Acer Liquid (1st gen Snapdragon (with Adreno 200) running 768MHz) to do a better Quadrant score than a stock Galaxy S. And of course the Liquid is NOT faster than the SGS except in calculating Pi.
Quadrant is completely invalid.
Tegra2 uses the GeForce ULV GPU which handles graphical output somewhat different than the other mobile GPUs out there. It works rather like a desktop GPU in the way it renders graphics, while the Power VR SGX GPUs (in the Hummingbirds, A4, A5 and OMAPs) spit out plain pixels and triangles.
The Adreno 205 is 5x as fast as the Adreno 200 and is about as fast as the Power VR SGX540 in the SGS.
Qualcomm claims that the Adreno 220 would be 5x as fast as the Adreno 205.
I hope that the Adreno 22x chips will be able to render graphics in a sophisticated way and will be available in the near future.
There is a reason why Sony Ericsson puts an Adreno 205 in its Xperia Play.
There is a reason why tons of game developers port their console titles to the Tegra2.
Their analysts surely came across these lacking benchmarks presented in this article, and they still decided to port their titles to Adreno 205 and Tegra2 over Hummingbird and OMAP.
I think with the Adreno 220 it is going to be the same. I see a Xperia Play 2 comming.
I’m sure the vote EVO 3D with its large 4.3″ 940×560 QHD screen won’t have these kind of benchmark numbers. Especially since it will only be a 1.2 ghz dualcore CPU. But those are trade offs I’m willing to have. It is 3 months away from launch So it’s possible htc may squeeze out great numbers.
I’m sure the vote EVO 3D with its large 4.3″ 940×560 QHD screen won’t have these kind of benchmark numbers. Especially since it will only be a 1.2 ghz dualcore CPU. But those are trade offs I’m willing to have. It is 3 months away from launch So it’s possible htc may squeeze out great numbers.
I’m sure the vote EVO 3D with its large 4.3″ 940×560 QHD screen won’t have these kind of benchmark numbers. Especially since it will only be a 1.2 ghz dualcore CPU. But those are trade offs I’m willing to have. It is 3 months away from launch So it’s possible htc may squeeze out great numbers.
I’m sure the vote EVO 3D with its large 4.3″ 940×560 QHD screen won’t have these kind of benchmark numbers. Especially since it will only be a 1.2 ghz dualcore CPU. But those are trade offs I’m willing to have. It is 3 months away from launch So it’s possible htc may squeeze out great numbers.
I’m sure the vote EVO 3D with its large 4.3″ 940×560 QHD screen won’t have these kind of benchmark numbers. Especially since it will only be a 1.2 ghz dualcore CPU. But those are trade offs I’m willing to have. It is 3 months away from launch So it’s possible htc may squeeze out great numbers.
I’m sure the vote EVO 3D with its large 4.3″ 940×560 QHD screen won’t have these kind of benchmark numbers. Especially since it will only be a 1.2 ghz dualcore CPU. But those are trade offs I’m willing to have. It is 3 months away from launch So it’s possible htc may squeeze out great numbers.
So Qualcomm just barely matched performance of Tegra2, OMAP4 nearly 6 months later? At the same clock, it’s still tad slower. Also when OMAP5, Tegra3 drops into phone later this year, this will be forgotten and they will rule over snapdragon.
This is just an ARM 8 cpu. Wait till Qualcomm’s ARM 9 cpu.
This is just an ARM 8 cpu. Wait till Qualcomm’s ARM 9 cpu.
This is just an ARM 8 cpu. Wait till Qualcomm’s ARM 9 cpu.
This is just an ARM 8 cpu. Wait till Qualcomm’s ARM 9 cpu.
This is just an ARM 8 cpu. Wait till Qualcomm’s ARM 9 cpu.
This is just an ARM 8 cpu. Wait till Qualcomm’s ARM 9 cpu.
This is just an ARM 8 cpu. Wait till Qualcomm’s ARM 9 cpu.
This is just an ARM 8 cpu. Wait till Qualcomm’s ARM 9 cpu.
This is just an ARM 8 cpu. Wait till Qualcomm’s ARM 9 cpu.
So Qualcomm just barely matched performance of Tegra2, OMAP4 nearly 6 months later? At the same clock, it’s still tad slower. Also when OMAP5, Tegra3 drops into phone later this year, this will be forgotten and they will rule over snapdragon.
So Qualcomm just barely matched performance of Tegra2, OMAP4 nearly 6 months later? At the same clock, it’s still tad slower. Also when OMAP5, Tegra3 drops into phone later this year, this will be forgotten and they will rule over snapdragon.
So Qualcomm just barely matched performance of Tegra2, OMAP4 nearly 6 months later? At the same clock, it’s still tad slower. Also when OMAP5, Tegra3 drops into phone later this year, this will be forgotten and they will rule over snapdragon.
So Qualcomm just barely matched performance of Tegra2, OMAP4 nearly 6 months later? At the same clock, it’s still tad slower. Also when OMAP5, Tegra3 drops into phone later this year, this will be forgotten and they will rule over snapdragon.
So Qualcomm just barely matched performance of Tegra2, OMAP4 nearly 6 months later? At the same clock, it’s still tad slower. Also when OMAP5, Tegra3 drops into phone later this year, this will be forgotten and they will rule over snapdragon.
But a quad core Nvidia gives me a tingle down there…..
if the chipset performs as the test shows then sweet. however, where are the phones that are going to be using this chipset? they are bragging about the performance yet there are no devices in the near future that are going to using the chips. at least we are getting tegra2 chipsets, and the galaxy s is still holding strong. let’s wait until the phones that use this chip releases, then compare it to other phones that are releasing at that time and see how well it holds up. by the time those are being used, there will be even stronger versions of the tegra chipset, and let’s see what the orion chipset can do as well. either way, whichever chipset comes out on top, you can’t lose with either one of them! we will be in for a real treat as these companies compete to create the ultimate phone!
if the chipset performs as the test shows then sweet. however, where are the phones that are going to be using this chipset? they are bragging about the performance yet there are no devices in the near future that are going to using the chips. at least we are getting tegra2 chipsets, and the galaxy s is still holding strong. let’s wait until the phones that use this chip releases, then compare it to other phones that are releasing at that time and see how well it holds up. by the time those are being used, there will be even stronger versions of the tegra chipset, and let’s see what the orion chipset can do as well. either way, whichever chipset comes out on top, you can’t lose with either one of them! we will be in for a real treat as these companies compete to create the ultimate phone!
if the chipset performs as the test shows then sweet. however, where are the phones that are going to be using this chipset? they are bragging about the performance yet there are no devices in the near future that are going to using the chips. at least we are getting tegra2 chipsets, and the galaxy s is still holding strong. let’s wait until the phones that use this chip releases, then compare it to other phones that are releasing at that time and see how well it holds up. by the time those are being used, there will be even stronger versions of the tegra chipset, and let’s see what the orion chipset can do as well. either way, whichever chipset comes out on top, you can’t lose with either one of them! we will be in for a real treat as these companies compete to create the ultimate phone!
if the chipset performs as the test shows then sweet. however, where are the phones that are going to be using this chipset? they are bragging about the performance yet there are no devices in the near future that are going to using the chips. at least we are getting tegra2 chipsets, and the galaxy s is still holding strong. let’s wait until the phones that use this chip releases, then compare it to other phones that are releasing at that time and see how well it holds up. by the time those are being used, there will be even stronger versions of the tegra chipset, and let’s see what the orion chipset can do as well. either way, whichever chipset comes out on top, you can’t lose with either one of them! we will be in for a real treat as these companies compete to create the ultimate phone!
if the chipset performs as the test shows then sweet. however, where are the phones that are going to be using this chipset? they are bragging about the performance yet there are no devices in the near future that are going to using the chips. at least we are getting tegra2 chipsets, and the galaxy s is still holding strong. let’s wait until the phones that use this chip releases, then compare it to other phones that are releasing at that time and see how well it holds up. by the time those are being used, there will be even stronger versions of the tegra chipset, and let’s see what the orion chipset can do as well. either way, whichever chipset comes out on top, you can’t lose with either one of them! we will be in for a real treat as these companies compete to create the ultimate phone!
if the chipset performs as the test shows then sweet. however, where are the phones that are going to be using this chipset? they are bragging about the performance yet there are no devices in the near future that are going to using the chips. at least we are getting tegra2 chipsets, and the galaxy s is still holding strong. let’s wait until the phones that use this chip releases, then compare it to other phones that are releasing at that time and see how well it holds up. by the time those are being used, there will be even stronger versions of the tegra chipset, and let’s see what the orion chipset can do as well. either way, whichever chipset comes out on top, you can’t lose with either one of them! we will be in for a real treat as these companies compete to create the ultimate phone!
if the chipset performs as the test shows then sweet. however, where are the phones that are going to be using this chipset? they are bragging about the performance yet there are no devices in the near future that are going to using the chips. at least we are getting tegra2 chipsets, and the galaxy s is still holding strong. let’s wait until the phones that use this chip releases, then compare it to other phones that are releasing at that time and see how well it holds up. by the time those are being used, there will be even stronger versions of the tegra chipset, and let’s see what the orion chipset can do as well. either way, whichever chipset comes out on top, you can’t lose with either one of them! we will be in for a real treat as these companies compete to create the ultimate phone!
if the chipset performs as the test shows then sweet. however, where are the phones that are going to be using this chipset? they are bragging about the performance yet there are no devices in the near future that are going to using the chips. at least we are getting tegra2 chipsets, and the galaxy s is still holding strong. let’s wait until the phones that use this chip releases, then compare it to other phones that are releasing at that time and see how well it holds up. by the time those are being used, there will be even stronger versions of the tegra chipset, and let’s see what the orion chipset can do as well. either way, whichever chipset comes out on top, you can’t lose with either one of them! we will be in for a real treat as these companies compete to create the ultimate phone!
if the chipset performs as the test shows then sweet. however, where are the phones that are going to be using this chipset? they are bragging about the performance yet there are no devices in the near future that are going to using the chips. at least we are getting tegra2 chipsets, and the galaxy s is still holding strong. let’s wait until the phones that use this chip releases, then compare it to other phones that are releasing at that time and see how well it holds up. by the time those are being used, there will be even stronger versions of the tegra chipset, and let’s see what the orion chipset can do as well. either way, whichever chipset comes out on top, you can’t lose with either one of them! we will be in for a real treat as these companies compete to create the ultimate phone!
Oh
Ok