If a boy received text messages from “a friend” urging him to commit suicide, is the friend a murderer if they follow through? That’s the question in the case of Conrad Roy III’s suicide. When we posed that question to our readers the decision was split: about 50% of Phandroid readers found the friend – Michelle Carter – should be found guilty (the charge became manslaughter, not murder).
Today the judge heard the closing statements from the prosecution and defense which were followed by a short recess. When the judge returned he delivered his final decision.
The judge found that Michelle Carter’s young age played a balanced role in the decision, acknowledging that she was a mature and capable young lady and her young age offered a greater possibility of rehabilitation.
Because the crime happened at the age of 17 she faced trial in jouvenile court and was sentenced to 2.5 years in a local house of corrections, among other stipulations such as an extensive probation thereafter. The judge forbid contact with the victim’s family and witnesses of the case.
Bottom line: she is going to jail for 2.5 years.
Do you think the judge made the right decision in this case? Tell us why or why not in the comments!
[polldaddy poll=9802135]
The bottom line is that digital communication is serious and not a game. Cyber bullying and online threats from trolls, keyboard warriors, e-toughguys – even if meant for only entertainment – do not absolve the abusers of the circumstances they inflict.
So please: be nice to people, whether in person, on the phone, or online!