By 
Earlier today, the New York times reported Google would be laying off some 4,000 Motorola employees in an attempt to achieve “sustainable profitability,” as part of a restructuring effort. Now, that information has been confirmed in an official Form 8-K filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released just today, and signed by Google Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President Patrick Pichette.
The filing details plans for the layoffs (of which 2/3rds will occur outside the US), with 1/3rd of Motorola’s 90 facilities facing closure. While this is no doubt bad news for all of those losing their jobs, Google went on to promise “generous severance packages” in addition to helping their former employees find new jobs via outplacement services. And if “generous” is anything like Google’s employee death package for widowed spouses/partners, I’d say they’re in pretty good hands.
On August 3, 2012, Motorola Mobility (Motorola), a wholly owned subsidiary of Google Inc. (Google), determined that it would reduce its headcount by approximately 4,000 out of a total of about 20,000 employees. Two-thirds of the reduction is set to occur outside of the U.S. In addition, Motorola plans to close or consolidate about one-third of its 90 facilities, as well as simplify its mobile product portfolio—shifting the emphasis from feature phones to more innovative and profitable devices.
These changes are designed to return Motorola’s mobile devices unit to profitability, after it lost money in fourteen of the last sixteen quarters. That said, investors should expect to see significant revenue variability for Motorola for several quarters. While lower expenses are likely to lag the immediate negative impact to revenue, Google sees these actions as a key step for Motorola to achieve sustainable profitability.
Motorola understands how hard these changes will be for the employees concerned and is committed to helping them through this difficult transition. Motorola will be providing generous severance packages, as well as outplacement services to help the employees find new jobs. Google expects to incur a severance-related charge of no greater than $275 million, which it believes will be largely recognized in the third quarter, with the remaining severance-related costs recognized by the end of 2012. Google also expects to incur other restructuring charges related to the actions described above, the majority of which will be recognized in the third quarter. Although Google cannot currently predict the amount of these other charges at this time, these additional charges could be significant.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Current Report on Form 8-K contains forward-looking statements about Google’s plans for its Motorola business. These statements involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from Google’s expectations. The potential risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from the results predicted include, among others, whether Google will be able to refocus Motorola’s product portfolio and complete the consolidation of Motorola’s facilities as and when planned, whether the expected timing and amount of the costs associated with these and other actions will meet or exceed Google’s forecasts, whether taking these and other actions to improve the profitability of the Motorola business will meet or exceed Google’s expectations and whether Google’s plans for new product introductions will be successful. Other risks and uncertainties that can affect Google’s performance are included under the captions “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and the most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, which are on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and on Google’s investor relations website at investor.google.com. All information provided in this Current Report on Form 8-K is as of August 13, 2012, and Google undertakes no duty to update this information unless required by law.
It says “Two-thirds of the reduction is set to occur outside of the U.S.” If that means a third happens inside the U.S. that’s not compatible with the qualifier ” (which will occur outside the US),” or with the headline’s ”
4,000 Motorola Jobs Being Cut Overseas”.
Whoops. Forgot to update. *Fixed.
Googles PR strategy was genius, as the news about ‘widows of googles employees getting half the paycheck’ softened the blow of this news!
Makes it harder for people to dislike google for this decision.
PS: i’m not saying their decision on laying off people was right or wrong, just saying that their PR was geniur :)
PR release was genius? They just saying what they are doing. And I believe that is what they are going to do. Do you mean the release of this information was genius?
Taken that at the same time the whole crowd of RIM employees are getting laid off, the NA labor market will get flood with ready-to-hire communications specialists.
The death in employment benefit offered by Google is justified because “Google believes the generous package improves retention and performance of its employees.” (as read here: http://www.wxyz.com/dpp/news/google-executive-talks-about-death-package-offered-to-employees-partners-and-kids-benefit-greatly#ixzz23X7mz5gq). This motivation is not present for those who are about to be cut lose so it may not be as generous for those reasons.
C’mon guys…I know it’s an Android fan site, but there’s no reason to be Google’s PR tool on this one. Including the “generous” severance package in the headline is just putting lipstick on a pig. It’s layoffs, pure and simple. Why not just let the headline be about layoffs? And the death benefit is a totally irrelevant apple-and-oranges detail to add in – the only purpose is, again, to try to soften news that shouldn’t be softened. From a Google company standpoint, there might be logical reasons to do layoffs, but your site should show some respect for people losing their jobs, and simply call it as it is. Saying the now-jobless are in “pretty good hands”? Really??