<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Numbers No One Wants to Talk About in the Android vs. iPhone Sales Battle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phandroid.com/2010/07/21/the-numbers-no-one-wants-to-talk-about-in-the-android-vs-iphone-sales-battle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/07/21/the-numbers-no-one-wants-to-talk-about-in-the-android-vs-iphone-sales-battle/</link>
	<description>Android Phone News, Rumors, Reviews, Apps, Forums &#38; More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 02:51:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Factoid</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/07/21/the-numbers-no-one-wants-to-talk-about-in-the-android-vs-iphone-sales-battle/#comment-220930</link>
		<dc:creator>Factoid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=24042#comment-220930</guid>
		<description>For Geezer, I wouldn&#039;t talk about the green stuff since google is bigger than apple. You know the search (web stuff) that your using on your iphone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Geezer, I wouldn&rsquo;t talk about the green stuff since google is bigger than apple. You know the search (web stuff) that your using on your iphone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Factoid</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/07/21/the-numbers-no-one-wants-to-talk-about-in-the-android-vs-iphone-sales-battle/#comment-220929</link>
		<dc:creator>Factoid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=24042#comment-220929</guid>
		<description>What are you people talking about. You can talk about apple selling 3 million iphones. It is Apple OS phones vs Google OS phones. (Just like PC VS Mac)  Like Pc vs Mac; PCs includes HP, Dell, IBM, Acer, Gateway, Generic  PC,  Custom Build PCs.  These PC’s usually runs windows and windows come from Microsoft.  Which Microsoft has outsold Apple.  That is why Microsoft is touted as a “Monopoly.”  Yes there are linux PCs but for sakes of just numbers we can say the majority are Microsoft Windows.  Just like PCs with windows Google Android is the Windows for phones..(Yes there are windows phones but for the sake of  just numbers  there are mostly Androids OS phones.) An android OS phone includes Evo, Samsung Galaxy, G1s, Nexus 1, Droid X, Incredible, Eris and more.   Same operating system(Google Android), different hardware(Flavor), with different carriers.  According to the sales Google Android OS is winning than Blackberry OS and finally Apple OS comes in third.  Apple(Iphone) comes in third place in sales!  Iphones sales can’t even beat the Blackberry in sales; that includes the iphone 4.  Here are the proof and the numbers 33% of the belongs to Android with 28% going to RIM and 22 % to Apple. You can argue with facts and the fact is in under 3 years Google OS has overtaken the most popular phone which was the Blackberry OS.  Apple is not even close. Google Wins period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you people talking about. You can talk about apple selling 3 million iphones. It is Apple OS phones vs Google OS phones. (Just like PC VS Mac)  Like Pc vs Mac; PCs includes HP, Dell, IBM, Acer, Gateway, Generic  PC,  Custom Build PCs.  These PC&rsquo;s usually runs windows and windows come from Microsoft.  Which Microsoft has outsold Apple.  That is why Microsoft is touted as a &ldquo;Monopoly.&rdquo;  Yes there are linux PCs but for sakes of just numbers we can say the majority are Microsoft Windows.  Just like PCs with windows Google Android is the Windows for phones..(Yes there are windows phones but for the sake of  just numbers  there are mostly Androids OS phones.) An android OS phone includes Evo, Samsung Galaxy, G1s, Nexus 1, Droid X, Incredible, Eris and more.   Same operating system(Google Android), different hardware(Flavor), with different carriers.  According to the sales Google Android OS is winning than Blackberry OS and finally Apple OS comes in third.  Apple(Iphone) comes in third place in sales!  Iphones sales can&rsquo;t even beat the Blackberry in sales; that includes the iphone 4.  Here are the proof and the numbers 33% of the belongs to Android with 28% going to RIM and 22 % to Apple. You can argue with facts and the fact is in under 3 years Google OS has overtaken the most popular phone which was the Blackberry OS.  Apple is not even close. Google Wins period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geezer</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/07/21/the-numbers-no-one-wants-to-talk-about-in-the-android-vs-iphone-sales-battle/#comment-181755</link>
		<dc:creator>Geezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 15:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=24042#comment-181755</guid>
		<description>Also in the news, McDonald&#039;s sells more meals than  OR
Ford sells more Fiestas than BMW OR...
you get the point</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also in the news, McDonald&#8217;s sells more meals than  OR<br />
Ford sells more Fiestas than BMW OR&#8230;<br />
you get the point</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geezer</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/07/21/the-numbers-no-one-wants-to-talk-about-in-the-android-vs-iphone-sales-battle/#comment-181754</link>
		<dc:creator>Geezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 15:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=24042#comment-181754</guid>
		<description>So, lets forget market-share for 1 second and talk profit-share....you know, the green stuff...yeah thats what I thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, lets forget market-share for 1 second and talk profit-share&hellip;.you know, the green stuff&hellip;yeah thats what I thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHEA</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/07/21/the-numbers-no-one-wants-to-talk-about-in-the-android-vs-iphone-sales-battle/#comment-179050</link>
		<dc:creator>CHEA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 06:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=24042#comment-179050</guid>
		<description>GO GOOGLE!! Its about time someone takes out the iPhone! Don&#039;t get me wrong I love Apple I owned the 2nd &amp; 3rd generation iPhone but I have to say the Android Phones are doing work. I own the Evo 4G and can&#039;t imagine going back to the iPhone for christ sake it took them 3 years to put add a flash on the phone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GO GOOGLE!! Its about time someone takes out the iPhone! Don&rsquo;t get me wrong I love Apple I owned the 2nd &amp; 3rd generation iPhone but I have to say the Android Phones are doing work. I own the Evo 4G and can&rsquo;t imagine going back to the iPhone for christ sake it took them 3 years to put add a flash on the phone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/07/21/the-numbers-no-one-wants-to-talk-about-in-the-android-vs-iphone-sales-battle/#comment-177050</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=24042#comment-177050</guid>
		<description>1) Apple didn&#039;t say they sold 9 million Iphones to end users they sold them to resellers. Come here in Europe and you&#039;ll find many unsold Iphone 3 types sitting on store shelves getting dusty. Almost all of those are going to end up getting sent back to Apple.

2) You can use an Apple on any of the carriers here. In the US Apple blames all problems on ATT. People here know better. 

3) An Iphone (Which isn&#039;t even the latest at the moment) costs at least 20% more then something like the latest Samsung. The   people willing to pay that premium have basically all moved to Apple already. There is almost no room for Apple to grow here unless they slash prices. Problem is Apple needs to fund it&#039;s costs while the third party Android makers obviously have no need to fund Android.

Now ask yourself this. If you&#039;re a carrier what do you gain by subsiding the Iphone? You know the people who want one already have one. You know Apple will blame you for the problems in the phone. You know you can make more money selling something else.

Now lets assume Apple actually improves the Iphone/Ipad. How many Mac sales does this steal? How many of the people here would be happier with something like the Samsung P1000 tablet/phone instead of two devices? Apple can&#039;t improve the Iphone/Ipad too much without hurting itself.


We&#039;ve seen this movie before. Apple tried to force people to do things it&#039;s way before. If you&#039;re old enough you remember when Apple was the largest PC maker in the world. When it&#039;s PC OS had a similar hold on the PC market that the Iphone has now. 

Apple&#039;s closed model always ends up with higher costs . It leads to openings for other companies to make something better.

To the comment that Apple is one maker versus many. That&#039;s the whole point. Apple needs to be perfect 100% of the time. Android makers don&#039;t. If the best Android phone this week comes from Samsung,LG,Sony, my maiden aunt it doesn&#039;t matter. Apple is fighting with clubs when everybody else is using nukes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Apple didn&rsquo;t say they sold 9 million Iphones to end users they sold them to resellers. Come here in Europe and you&rsquo;ll find many unsold Iphone 3 types sitting on store shelves getting dusty. Almost all of those are going to end up getting sent back to Apple.</p>
<p>2) You can use an Apple on any of the carriers here. In the US Apple blames all problems on ATT. People here know better. </p>
<p>3) An Iphone (Which isn&rsquo;t even the latest at the moment) costs at least 20% more then something like the latest Samsung. The   people willing to pay that premium have basically all moved to Apple already. There is almost no room for Apple to grow here unless they slash prices. Problem is Apple needs to fund it&rsquo;s costs while the third party Android makers obviously have no need to fund Android.</p>
<p>Now ask yourself this. If you&rsquo;re a carrier what do you gain by subsiding the Iphone? You know the people who want one already have one. You know Apple will blame you for the problems in the phone. You know you can make more money selling something else.</p>
<p>Now lets assume Apple actually improves the Iphone/Ipad. How many Mac sales does this steal? How many of the people here would be happier with something like the Samsung P1000 tablet/phone instead of two devices? Apple can&rsquo;t improve the Iphone/Ipad too much without hurting itself.</p>
<p>We&rsquo;ve seen this movie before. Apple tried to force people to do things it&rsquo;s way before. If you&rsquo;re old enough you remember when Apple was the largest PC maker in the world. When it&rsquo;s PC OS had a similar hold on the PC market that the Iphone has now. </p>
<p>Apple&rsquo;s closed model always ends up with higher costs . It leads to openings for other companies to make something better.</p>
<p>To the comment that Apple is one maker versus many. That&rsquo;s the whole point. Apple needs to be perfect 100% of the time. Android makers don&rsquo;t. If the best Android phone this week comes from Samsung,LG,Sony, my maiden aunt it doesn&rsquo;t matter. Apple is fighting with clubs when everybody else is using nukes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/07/21/the-numbers-no-one-wants-to-talk-about-in-the-android-vs-iphone-sales-battle/#comment-176598</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=24042#comment-176598</guid>
		<description>Just because lots more people are buying a certain system doesnt mean it is actually better, otherwise Windows would not be in the place it is today. 
Personally I&#039;m glad Android is succeeding, as there needs to be at least two viable systems to maintain competition. But I just wish the handset makers were adhering to more of Androids open past. Much of the useful stuff in Android is now tied up in patents, meaning no one else can use them. Many of its core services such as location are tied up in proprietary license deals with the data providors. 
So in short, Android is no open and free system competing with the proprietary giant, but in the end, I think Apple will still be happy with 20 or even only 10% of the market, because its customers are the one who will pay 80% more money overall to its application developers.
Andriod still suffers from one of the major problems Windows does today - it was far to easy to write crap applications.
In linux, the apps actually have to be really good to get wide acceptance as most are competing on the same cost - free. So if you choose OpenOffice over Google Docs, it is because it is better for you, and the way you work. It may not be true for someone who prefers to have their head in the cloud. On OS X, the community is quite small, but vocal, and well connected. Good apps rise to the top of the pile quickly. And all the free ones from Linux probably are available too (I switched my desktop from OpenSuse to OS X without having to change a single major app from Linux). Windows is getting better, but the large install base means it is also exposed to the most malware.

Android at the moment seems like where Windows was against OS2 back in the 90&#039;s. Limited deployment of OS 2 let MS take the initiative with NT and the Win32 architecture. They let anyone install it for a fee, and took over the world.
However Apple now are nearly as big as MS, the revenue is nearly the same, but completely different markets. MS has 90% with a 1% margin, and Apple have 10% with an 80% margin - or at least feels that way with their prices, but the product is perceived as good enough value it makes it worth while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because lots more people are buying a certain system doesnt mean it is actually better, otherwise Windows would not be in the place it is today.<br />
Personally I&#8217;m glad Android is succeeding, as there needs to be at least two viable systems to maintain competition. But I just wish the handset makers were adhering to more of Androids open past. Much of the useful stuff in Android is now tied up in patents, meaning no one else can use them. Many of its core services such as location are tied up in proprietary license deals with the data providors.<br />
So in short, Android is no open and free system competing with the proprietary giant, but in the end, I think Apple will still be happy with 20 or even only 10% of the market, because its customers are the one who will pay 80% more money overall to its application developers.<br />
Andriod still suffers from one of the major problems Windows does today &#8211; it was far to easy to write crap applications.<br />
In linux, the apps actually have to be really good to get wide acceptance as most are competing on the same cost &#8211; free. So if you choose OpenOffice over Google Docs, it is because it is better for you, and the way you work. It may not be true for someone who prefers to have their head in the cloud. On OS X, the community is quite small, but vocal, and well connected. Good apps rise to the top of the pile quickly. And all the free ones from Linux probably are available too (I switched my desktop from OpenSuse to OS X without having to change a single major app from Linux). Windows is getting better, but the large install base means it is also exposed to the most malware.</p>
<p>Android at the moment seems like where Windows was against OS2 back in the 90&#8242;s. Limited deployment of OS 2 let MS take the initiative with NT and the Win32 architecture. They let anyone install it for a fee, and took over the world.<br />
However Apple now are nearly as big as MS, the revenue is nearly the same, but completely different markets. MS has 90% with a 1% margin, and Apple have 10% with an 80% margin &#8211; or at least feels that way with their prices, but the product is perceived as good enough value it makes it worth while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guinness</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/07/21/the-numbers-no-one-wants-to-talk-about-in-the-android-vs-iphone-sales-battle/#comment-175858</link>
		<dc:creator>Guinness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=24042#comment-175858</guid>
		<description>You c&#039;ant compare an iphone with android. The first is a phone+os the second is only an os. Do the math as to which is making more money with a &quot;unit&quot; sold and what can then be further developed with it.
The important thing is if everyone is happy with the phone they have.
We will always have thank apple for opening the door to 100% tactile phone that no other constructor really had the balls to do for a decade. One everyone saw the popularity it is a bit easier to jump in ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You c&#8217;ant compare an iphone with android. The first is a phone+os the second is only an os. Do the math as to which is making more money with a &#8220;unit&#8221; sold and what can then be further developed with it.<br />
The important thing is if everyone is happy with the phone they have.<br />
We will always have thank apple for opening the door to 100% tactile phone that no other constructor really had the balls to do for a decade. One everyone saw the popularity it is a bit easier to jump in &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logical1</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/07/21/the-numbers-no-one-wants-to-talk-about-in-the-android-vs-iphone-sales-battle/#comment-175828</link>
		<dc:creator>Logical1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 15:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=24042#comment-175828</guid>
		<description>This does not surprise me that Android users are holding onto to any hope that they may have a better phone than the iPhone 4. Sorry. This is still not the case.
Apple does it best and cheap imitations will never outshine the iPhone 4! Just sayin&#039;..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This does not surprise me that Android users are holding onto to any hope that they may have a better phone than the iPhone 4. Sorry. This is still not the case.<br />
Apple does it best and cheap imitations will never outshine the iPhone 4! Just sayin&#8217;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/07/21/the-numbers-no-one-wants-to-talk-about-in-the-android-vs-iphone-sales-battle/#comment-175800</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=24042#comment-175800</guid>
		<description>I love Google - but I&#039;ve gotten to the point where I can&#039;t stand Fandroids any longer.

GOOGLE DIDN&#039;T SELL A DAMN THING.

Their Nexus One failed - their Android OS is FREAKING FREE - THEY DIDN&#039;T MAKE A DIME.

The point of a company is to make a profit and distribute the wealth among shareholders (using various strategies).

Yes - when you put a free OS on 100 devices, they will, absolutely, move more product than iPhones - a single device with a single OS.

To me - listening to the Fandroids logic goes something like this:

Did you hear Tostitos brand chips sold XX in the first 30 days?!  WOW!

Fandroid:  Yes but I read that _other_ chips _with salt_ are soon going to take over Tostitos sales!

...

China is making a custom Android build that won&#039;t support the Marketplace, There are already 4 or 5 different versions of the OS on various carriers here in the US - you all say &quot;Android&quot; like it&#039;s a single thing.  It&#039;s not - like Windows 95 is not 98 is not XP is not Vista - but they&#039;re all &quot;Windows&quot;.  

Who the f@#% cares how many phones _run_ Android?  Why does running this OS matter?  Are the companies who us it to make money actually profiting?  Are they doing 15.7 billion in quarterly sales?  Maybe some are and some aren&#039;t - why don&#039;t you all focus on the finances - the only purpose for a business to exist - instead of making apples to the sum of all other types of fruit comparisons?  

WHEN Android takes over iPhone market share - and it will - what will you have accomplished?  Not a damn company using it will be nearly as profitable as Apple is at handset sales and it&#039;s subsidiary revenue from the App Store, iTunes music, magazine subscriptions, etc.  

Android does not and will not ever have the smooth, tightly integrated user-experience of the iPhone - they CAN&#039;T because they don&#039;t CONTROL the OS anymore.  They released it to the wild, three cheers for open source, now let&#039;s see someone make a s@#% ton of money with it - then start flapping your tongues again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Google &ndash; but I&rsquo;ve gotten to the point where I can&rsquo;t stand Fandroids any longer.</p>
<p>GOOGLE DIDN&rsquo;T SELL A DAMN THING.</p>
<p>Their Nexus One failed &ndash; their Android OS is FREAKING FREE &ndash; THEY DIDN&rsquo;T MAKE A DIME.</p>
<p>The point of a company is to make a profit and distribute the wealth among shareholders (using various strategies).</p>
<p>Yes &ndash; when you put a free OS on 100 devices, they will, absolutely, move more product than iPhones &ndash; a single device with a single OS.</p>
<p>To me &ndash; listening to the Fandroids logic goes something like this:</p>
<p>Did you hear Tostitos brand chips sold XX in the first 30 days?!  WOW!</p>
<p>Fandroid:  Yes but I read that _other_ chips _with salt_ are soon going to take over Tostitos sales!</p>
<p>&hellip;</p>
<p>China is making a custom Android build that won&rsquo;t support the Marketplace, There are already 4 or 5 different versions of the OS on various carriers here in the US &ndash; you all say &ldquo;Android&rdquo; like it&rsquo;s a single thing.  It&rsquo;s not &ndash; like Windows 95 is not 98 is not XP is not Vista &ndash; but they&rsquo;re all &ldquo;Windows&rdquo;.  </p>
<p>Who the f@#% cares how many phones _run_ Android?  Why does running this OS matter?  Are the companies who us it to make money actually profiting?  Are they doing 15.7 billion in quarterly sales?  Maybe some are and some aren&rsquo;t &ndash; why don&rsquo;t you all focus on the finances &ndash; the only purpose for a business to exist &ndash; instead of making apples to the sum of all other types of fruit comparisons?  </p>
<p>WHEN Android takes over iPhone market share &ndash; and it will &ndash; what will you have accomplished?  Not a damn company using it will be nearly as profitable as Apple is at handset sales and it&rsquo;s subsidiary revenue from the App Store, iTunes music, magazine subscriptions, etc.  </p>
<p>Android does not and will not ever have the smooth, tightly integrated user-experience of the iPhone &ndash; they CAN&rsquo;T because they don&rsquo;t CONTROL the OS anymore.  They released it to the wild, three cheers for open source, now let&rsquo;s see someone make a s@#% ton of money with it &ndash; then start flapping your tongues again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rutger</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/07/21/the-numbers-no-one-wants-to-talk-about-in-the-android-vs-iphone-sales-battle/#comment-175570</link>
		<dc:creator>Rutger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 19:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=24042#comment-175570</guid>
		<description>How many companies are selling Android-based phones? And how many are selling iOS-based phones? Of course it&#039;s just a matter of time before the Android OS is market leader. Anything else would be a real failure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many companies are selling Android-based phones? And how many are selling iOS-based phones? Of course it&rsquo;s just a matter of time before the Android OS is market leader. Anything else would be a real failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/07/21/the-numbers-no-one-wants-to-talk-about-in-the-android-vs-iphone-sales-battle/#comment-175529</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=24042#comment-175529</guid>
		<description>hahah fail. there are hundreds of android phones and they barely beat ONE phone in sales. GZ! morons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahah fail. there are hundreds of android phones and they barely beat ONE phone in sales. GZ! morons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobcat Arts</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/07/21/the-numbers-no-one-wants-to-talk-about-in-the-android-vs-iphone-sales-battle/#comment-175304</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobcat Arts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 01:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=24042#comment-175304</guid>
		<description>First smart phone I&#039;ve ever owned is the Droid Incredible. It&#039;s... incredible. This IS the droid I&#039;m looking for!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First smart phone I&rsquo;ve ever owned is the Droid Incredible. It&rsquo;s&hellip; incredible. This IS the droid I&rsquo;m looking for!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.O.B.</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/07/21/the-numbers-no-one-wants-to-talk-about-in-the-android-vs-iphone-sales-battle/#comment-175142</link>
		<dc:creator>B.O.B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=24042#comment-175142</guid>
		<description>Android fans gonna throw a party once the number of mobiles using Android surpasses the number of mobiles using iOS...

...but hey, only the iPhone uses iOS while an army of trashy mobiles uses Android.

Keep in mind that half of the Android devices out there are stuck to versions 1.5 and 1.6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Android fans gonna throw a party once the number of mobiles using Android surpasses the number of mobiles using iOS&hellip;</p>
<p>&hellip;but hey, only the iPhone uses iOS while an army of trashy mobiles uses Android.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that half of the Android devices out there are stuck to versions 1.5 and 1.6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chang</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/07/21/the-numbers-no-one-wants-to-talk-about-in-the-android-vs-iphone-sales-battle/#comment-174988</link>
		<dc:creator>chang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=24042#comment-174988</guid>
		<description>but that&#039;s not exactly apples vs. oranges. a more reasonable comparison would be to compare the highest-selling android smartphone&#039;s sales vs. the iphone4. 

while we could say that the figures discussed compare the android OS to the iOS, it&#039;s an irrelevant comparison given that apple intentionally closes its OS to 3rd parties whereas google fervently proselytizes, so uptake is not reflective of how good the operating systems are. 

so in the end, i don&#039;t understand what argument, if any, is being made here. to compare ALL android phones to the iphone4 is rather weak and fanboi-ish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but that&rsquo;s not exactly apples vs. oranges. a more reasonable comparison would be to compare the highest-selling android smartphone&rsquo;s sales vs. the iphone4. </p>
<p>while we could say that the figures discussed compare the android OS to the iOS, it&rsquo;s an irrelevant comparison given that apple intentionally closes its OS to 3rd parties whereas google fervently proselytizes, so uptake is not reflective of how good the operating systems are. </p>
<p>so in the end, i don&rsquo;t understand what argument, if any, is being made here. to compare ALL android phones to the iphone4 is rather weak and fanboi-ish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.038 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 432/450 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: phandroid.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: phandroid.com @ 2012-05-27 21:14:56 -->
