<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple: Enjoy Your iPhone, Prudes! Android: Party On!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phandroid.com/2010/02/21/apple-enjoy-your-iphone-prudes-android-party-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/02/21/apple-enjoy-your-iphone-prudes-android-party-on/</link>
	<description>Android Phone News, Rumors, Reviews, Apps, Forums &#38; More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 02:51:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiKandi</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/02/21/apple-enjoy-your-iphone-prudes-android-party-on/#comment-87290</link>
		<dc:creator>MiKandi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=12652#comment-87290</guid>
		<description>Apple’s new ‘overtly sexual app’ policy doesn’t come as a surprise. They’re too big and mainstream as a company to cater to the adult space.  We actually applaud Apple’s efforts to be more clear with their policy regarding sexual content. In fact, we’d like to thank them! After all, Vegas wouldn’t feel like Vegas, if we didn’t have Disneyland for a comparison.

In lieu of their recent decision, we actually received an influx of new developers registering on MiKandi - The World&#039;s First Adult Only Mobile App Store on Android devices. Many more have expressed their interest to port their recently banned adult apps over to Android (can’t wait to see all the goodies!). Later this year we’ll be available across multiple platforms (Jailbroken iPhone at the top of the list).

For those interested, this is a great alternative market place for adult app content. We don’t have censorship or heavy restrictions like other App Stores. As long as it’s legal, it’s good to go. So for those that have had apps rejected from Apple’s App Store, you’re more than welcome to publish your content on MiKandi! =)

Keep up to date at www.blog.mikandi.com or follow us on Twitter: @MiKandiStore

MiKandi  - The App Store that treats you like an Adult</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple&rsquo;s new &lsquo;overtly sexual app&rsquo; policy doesn&rsquo;t come as a surprise. They&rsquo;re too big and mainstream as a company to cater to the adult space.  We actually applaud Apple&rsquo;s efforts to be more clear with their policy regarding sexual content. In fact, we&rsquo;d like to thank them! After all, Vegas wouldn&rsquo;t feel like Vegas, if we didn&rsquo;t have Disneyland for a comparison.</p>
<p>In lieu of their recent decision, we actually received an influx of new developers registering on MiKandi &ndash; The World&rsquo;s First Adult Only Mobile App Store on Android devices. Many more have expressed their interest to port their recently banned adult apps over to Android (can&rsquo;t wait to see all the goodies!). Later this year we&rsquo;ll be available across multiple platforms (Jailbroken iPhone at the top of the list).</p>
<p>For those interested, this is a great alternative market place for adult app content. We don&rsquo;t have censorship or heavy restrictions like other App Stores. As long as it&rsquo;s legal, it&rsquo;s good to go. So for those that have had apps rejected from Apple&rsquo;s App Store, you&rsquo;re more than welcome to publish your content on MiKandi! =)</p>
<p>Keep up to date at <a href="http://www.blog.mikandi.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.blog.mikandi.com</a> or follow us on Twitter: @MiKandiStore</p>
<p>MiKandi  &ndash; The App Store that treats you like an Adult</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lukehluke</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/02/21/apple-enjoy-your-iphone-prudes-android-party-on/#comment-86359</link>
		<dc:creator>Lukehluke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 17:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=12652#comment-86359</guid>
		<description>Apple need to let more apps onto the store e.g. Opera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple need to let more apps onto the store e.g. Opera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AzureSky</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/02/21/apple-enjoy-your-iphone-prudes-android-party-on/#comment-86199</link>
		<dc:creator>AzureSky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=12652#comment-86199</guid>
		<description>I think everybody should start reporting apps,music and movies that have any skin showing (Books thats covers have skin depicted as well) saying they are to sexually arousing ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think everybody should start reporting apps,music and movies that have any skin showing (Books thats covers have skin depicted as well) saying they are to sexually arousing ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/02/21/apple-enjoy-your-iphone-prudes-android-party-on/#comment-85733</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=12652#comment-85733</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s up with the image illustrating this article?? It looks like something a sex-pest prisoner might scrawl using blunted crayons to pass an afternoon. Creepy.
Back on topic - it seems entirely reasonable to me that these apps should be pulled. Apple are a private business and as such have no obligation to maintain freedom of expression (which is an overly grandiose phrase to use in the same context as an app that lets you jiggle boobs about). Who buys these apps anyway? That&#039;s right, teenage boys, so maybe Apple have a point. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s up with the image illustrating this article?? It looks like something a sex-pest prisoner might scrawl using blunted crayons to pass an afternoon. Creepy.<br />
Back on topic &#8211; it seems entirely reasonable to me that these apps should be pulled. Apple are a private business and as such have no obligation to maintain freedom of expression (which is an overly grandiose phrase to use in the same context as an app that lets you jiggle boobs about). Who buys these apps anyway? That&#8217;s right, teenage boys, so maybe Apple have a point. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Stenberg</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/02/21/apple-enjoy-your-iphone-prudes-android-party-on/#comment-85529</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Stenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=12652#comment-85529</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll admit that I&#039;m an Apple fanboy through and through...or, at least, I was...  I&#039;ve never been a fan of their closed computing environment on the iPhone (and now, the iPad), but it served my needs very well so I didn&#039;t feel it was worth complaining about overly much.

Drinking the kool-aid?  Perhaps.

Succumbed to the Apple RDF?  Almost certainly.

...but this prudish censoring of apps reminiscent of 17th century colonial America is just too much for me.  I can no longer stand behind a company that assumes this level of control.  Until Apple reforms their policies, they won&#039;t get another cent from me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&rsquo;ll admit that I&rsquo;m an Apple fanboy through and through&hellip;or, at least, I was&hellip;  I&rsquo;ve never been a fan of their closed computing environment on the iPhone (and now, the iPad), but it served my needs very well so I didn&rsquo;t feel it was worth complaining about overly much.</p>
<p>Drinking the kool-aid?  Perhaps.</p>
<p>Succumbed to the Apple RDF?  Almost certainly.</p>
<p>&hellip;but this prudish censoring of apps reminiscent of 17th century colonial America is just too much for me.  I can no longer stand behind a company that assumes this level of control.  Until Apple reforms their policies, they won&rsquo;t get another cent from me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just my 2 cent</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/02/21/apple-enjoy-your-iphone-prudes-android-party-on/#comment-85276</link>
		<dc:creator>just my 2 cent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=12652#comment-85276</guid>
		<description>Why are teens and children at risk from adult oriented apps? Because their parents made the choice to allow them a mobile device which can access them. Does a child really need a mobile that will do anything more than phone calls and text. No they don&#039;t. They barely need that.

If kids weren&#039;t given these devices then parents wouldn&#039;t have to worry about what they were using them for.

It&#039;s sort of like handing your child a handgun and then demanding that stores stop selling bullets because your child has a gun. Or giving your child a car and demanding gas stations stop selling gas because your child has a car.

The way I see it Apple was forced to censor the app store because irresponsible parents were allowing their children unrestricted access to the app store.

Way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are teens and children at risk from adult oriented apps? Because their parents made the choice to allow them a mobile device which can access them. Does a child really need a mobile that will do anything more than phone calls and text. No they don&rsquo;t. They barely need that.</p>
<p>If kids weren&rsquo;t given these devices then parents wouldn&rsquo;t have to worry about what they were using them for.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s sort of like handing your child a handgun and then demanding that stores stop selling bullets because your child has a gun. Or giving your child a car and demanding gas stations stop selling gas because your child has a car.</p>
<p>The way I see it Apple was forced to censor the app store because irresponsible parents were allowing their children unrestricted access to the app store.</p>
<p>Way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZombieReagan</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/02/21/apple-enjoy-your-iphone-prudes-android-party-on/#comment-85272</link>
		<dc:creator>ZombieReagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=12652#comment-85272</guid>
		<description>Like it or not, Apple is in the business of censoring apps, and they&#039;ve made it clear that they have the power to uninstall anything at anytime on the device you purchased. 

To those of you that run around claiming moral high ground on this, the issue is that many people are shocked when a company begins to remove previously approved software from their devices. Yes Apple has the right to do what ever they want with their device, and Google can (and will) remove any app from their store that they want to. 

The big difference is that Google allows for 3rd party marketplaces to be installed on their device, and Apple doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like it or not, Apple is in the business of censoring apps, and they&rsquo;ve made it clear that they have the power to uninstall anything at anytime on the device you purchased. </p>
<p>To those of you that run around claiming moral high ground on this, the issue is that many people are shocked when a company begins to remove previously approved software from their devices. Yes Apple has the right to do what ever they want with their device, and Google can (and will) remove any app from their store that they want to. </p>
<p>The big difference is that Google allows for 3rd party marketplaces to be installed on their device, and Apple doesn&rsquo;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exapted</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/02/21/apple-enjoy-your-iphone-prudes-android-party-on/#comment-85250</link>
		<dc:creator>exapted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=12652#comment-85250</guid>
		<description>Censorship!

censorship &#124;ˈsensərˌ sh ip&#124;
noun
the practice of officially examining books, movies, etc., and suppressing unacceptable parts : details of the visit were subject to military censorship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Censorship!</p>
<p>censorship |&#712;sens&#601;r&#716; sh ip|<br>
noun<br>
the practice of officially examining books, movies, etc., and suppressing unacceptable parts : details of the visit were subject to military censorship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/02/21/apple-enjoy-your-iphone-prudes-android-party-on/#comment-85219</link>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=12652#comment-85219</guid>
		<description>Google does this is its search by allowing you to set a strict/moderate/none content setting. If visitors to the App Store, Market, etc. had the ability to filter, then people could make their own decisions. If you don&#039;t like what you see, change the channel. 

Does multi touch work with the iBoob app?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google does this is its search by allowing you to set a strict/moderate/none content setting. If visitors to the App Store, Market, etc. had the ability to filter, then people could make their own decisions. If you don&rsquo;t like what you see, change the channel. </p>
<p>Does multi touch work with the iBoob app?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: destardi</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/02/21/apple-enjoy-your-iphone-prudes-android-party-on/#comment-85113</link>
		<dc:creator>destardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=12652#comment-85113</guid>
		<description>Smartybollox wrote on February 21, 2010
---------------------------------------

Oh please.  If the iphone was so great, where was picture messaging for it?  Why were there so many many posts when Pandora was made available to the iPhone from owners whining &quot;I love pandora, but I hate that the music gets interrupted if I want to send a text, open another app, blah blah blah&quot;  

The iPhone is pretty, easy enough for a 5 year old to use (is that REALLY a plus?!?), and....well, that&#039;s about it.

Remember how Ford made cars available to the everyday joe, because they were functional, fairly inexpensive, and &#039;reliable&#039;?  Does that mean Ford remained the innovator so many years later?  Or was it improved on by other car manufacturers?  

Unless you&#039;ve pulled the notification blind down to access a phone call already in progress, while checking your notes on a sticky pad, getting a number from a text message, used navigation while driving (pumping through your car speakers) while playing Pandora or Slacker or LastFM you really have no freakin clue as to how limited the iPhone is.

Get this iphone fanboys:
The iPhone / AT&amp;T brags you can surf the net while talking on the phone, BUT Android allows you to do that too IF it had a different carrier.  That does not make the iPHone itself special.
AND
Android (Droid) can multitask, and it has nothing to do with the carrier...the iPhone cannot.

So essentially AT&amp;T&#039;s commercials are not supportive of the iPhone but their network, and Droid Does.

Apple is censoring their app store, no question about it.  And typical, is its supporters defending it, because they&#039;re so brainwashed into thinking it&#039;s either this way or that way (I can run either this app, or that app) when in fact you can have it both ways by doing what Tom posted.

If the iPhone is for the unwashed masses (anyone, even a FIVE year old can use it!!!drool), then Android is for the more sophisticated users.

Eat it apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smartybollox wrote on February 21, 2010<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Oh please.  If the iphone was so great, where was picture messaging for it?  Why were there so many many posts when Pandora was made available to the iPhone from owners whining &#8220;I love pandora, but I hate that the music gets interrupted if I want to send a text, open another app, blah blah blah&#8221;  </p>
<p>The iPhone is pretty, easy enough for a 5 year old to use (is that REALLY a plus?!?), and&#8230;.well, that&#8217;s about it.</p>
<p>Remember how Ford made cars available to the everyday joe, because they were functional, fairly inexpensive, and &#8216;reliable&#8217;?  Does that mean Ford remained the innovator so many years later?  Or was it improved on by other car manufacturers?  </p>
<p>Unless you&#8217;ve pulled the notification blind down to access a phone call already in progress, while checking your notes on a sticky pad, getting a number from a text message, used navigation while driving (pumping through your car speakers) while playing Pandora or Slacker or LastFM you really have no freakin clue as to how limited the iPhone is.</p>
<p>Get this iphone fanboys:<br />
The iPhone / AT&amp;T brags you can surf the net while talking on the phone, BUT Android allows you to do that too IF it had a different carrier.  That does not make the iPHone itself special.<br />
AND<br />
Android (Droid) can multitask, and it has nothing to do with the carrier&#8230;the iPhone cannot.</p>
<p>So essentially AT&amp;T&#8217;s commercials are not supportive of the iPhone but their network, and Droid Does.</p>
<p>Apple is censoring their app store, no question about it.  And typical, is its supporters defending it, because they&#8217;re so brainwashed into thinking it&#8217;s either this way or that way (I can run either this app, or that app) when in fact you can have it both ways by doing what Tom posted.</p>
<p>If the iPhone is for the unwashed masses (anyone, even a FIVE year old can use it!!!drool), then Android is for the more sophisticated users.</p>
<p>Eat it apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bones</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/02/21/apple-enjoy-your-iphone-prudes-android-party-on/#comment-85076</link>
		<dc:creator>bones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=12652#comment-85076</guid>
		<description>Well as I see it even if Google didn&#039;t want pornographic content... since. They have an open platform SOMEONE else like say Mikandi could provide the adult apps. However seeing as Apple doesn&#039;t seem to have the same plan, to be open, I think you would need as least a choice and some sort of verification of age to access such aps. But not just complete censoring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well as I see it even if Google didn&rsquo;t want pornographic content&hellip; since. They have an open platform SOMEONE else like say Mikandi could provide the adult apps. However seeing as Apple doesn&rsquo;t seem to have the same plan, to be open, I think you would need as least a choice and some sort of verification of age to access such aps. But not just complete censoring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve the Job</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/02/21/apple-enjoy-your-iphone-prudes-android-party-on/#comment-85056</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve the Job</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=12652#comment-85056</guid>
		<description>Apple, rotten to the core. Fanboi losers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple, rotten to the core. Fanboi losers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve the Job</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/02/21/apple-enjoy-your-iphone-prudes-android-party-on/#comment-85052</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve the Job</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=12652#comment-85052</guid>
		<description>Bend over Apple fanbois, your dictator is going to do you doggy-style!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bend over Apple fanbois, your dictator is going to do you doggy-style!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/02/21/apple-enjoy-your-iphone-prudes-android-party-on/#comment-85035</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=12652#comment-85035</guid>
		<description>I think apps like that are pretty ridiculous, and juvenile, and I&#039;d never use them.  On the other hand, I really object to someone who says, &quot;This offends me so nobody should be able to see it.&quot;  

It&#039;s Apple&#039;s app store.  They can do what they want up there.  But what&#039;s the alternative if you disagree with Apple and their closed system policy?

Simple. Don&#039;t buy iProducts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think apps like that are pretty ridiculous, and juvenile, and I&rsquo;d never use them.  On the other hand, I really object to someone who says, &ldquo;This offends me so nobody should be able to see it.&rdquo;  </p>
<p>It&rsquo;s Apple&rsquo;s app store.  They can do what they want up there.  But what&rsquo;s the alternative if you disagree with Apple and their closed system policy?</p>
<p>Simple. Don&rsquo;t buy iProducts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2010/02/21/apple-enjoy-your-iphone-prudes-android-party-on/#comment-85022</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=12652#comment-85022</guid>
		<description>Apple is being Prudent not Prude</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple is being Prudent not Prude</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/3 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 434/434 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: phandroid.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: phandroid.com @ 2012-02-05 10:56:35 -->
