Comments on: Motorola Devour Ad, Coming February 25th?

By: Somebody

Somebody — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:53:33 +0000

1) Blur is not a good thing. It is CRIPPLEWARE.
2) The reason why the jackson-flash went over badly was because it was UGLY!!!

By: DroidFan

DroidFan — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:26:47 +0000

Megan fox is hot, but that commercial totally sucked. they didnt showcase any thing about blur that make people want the phone and it didnt even say the name so how will the average consumer know what to buy? i realize blur phones are on multiple networks so thats why they didnt specify devour or show it was a verizon phone.But like rob said they could have flashed all the blur phones and at the end of the commercial showed all the network emblems that have them.

By: phoenix

phoenix — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 02:33:17 +0000

ugh, megan fox is so gross.

By: Carig

Carig — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:49:10 +0000

@jo high five

they don’t have to show the snatch, just make it known where she’s putting the phone, like an implied snatch

By: jo

jo — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:02:26 +0000

@Marvin
.
You underestimate the power of the snatch. It’s not looked upon the same way as a boob here in the states. A snatch is much more respected on our airwaves.

By: MarvinAndroid

MarvinAndroid — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:39:49 +0000

^ Oh yeah, that would go over well in a country which basically came to a halt after Janet Jackson flashed a half-boob.

By: jo

jo — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:26:08 +0000

In my honest marketing opinion I believe that their branding message would be a lot stronger if Megan Fox used the Motorola Devour as a vibrator. For example, someone calls her, she notices the phone is vibrating, she sticks it up her snatch.. GOLD! 5 MILLION DEVOURS SOLD ON OPENING DAY!