<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internal T-mobile Doc Confirms Google Phone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phandroid.com/2009/12/29/internal-t-mobile-doc-confirms-google-phone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/29/internal-t-mobile-doc-confirms-google-phone/</link>
	<description>Android Phone News, Rumors, Reviews, Apps, Forums &#38; More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 02:51:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobo</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/29/internal-t-mobile-doc-confirms-google-phone/#comment-72890</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 23:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=10106#comment-72890</guid>
		<description>I have been with T-mobile for a good 3 years, and have only just recently left the carrier to the big red.

Everyone saying that T-Mobile has strong coverage, I&#039;m happy for you, but T-Mobile reception in my area while I was with the company was terrible to say the least

In Southern California (Long Beach) T-Mobile is more than a joke, and I wouldn&#039;t switch back to the carrier unless some major improvements are made to the network. I got more than tired of waiting

Sooo, the Nexus One looks like an amazing phone, but I&#039;ll be just fine with my Droid... a great phone that actually works reliably</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been with T-mobile for a good 3 years, and have only just recently left the carrier to the big red.</p>
<p>Everyone saying that T-Mobile has strong coverage, I&rsquo;m happy for you, but T-Mobile reception in my area while I was with the company was terrible to say the least</p>
<p>In Southern California (Long Beach) T-Mobile is more than a joke, and I wouldn&rsquo;t switch back to the carrier unless some major improvements are made to the network. I got more than tired of waiting</p>
<p>Sooo, the Nexus One looks like an amazing phone, but I&rsquo;ll be just fine with my Droid&hellip; a great phone that actually works reliably</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mensahwatts</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/29/internal-t-mobile-doc-confirms-google-phone/#comment-72876</link>
		<dc:creator>Mensahwatts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 21:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=10106#comment-72876</guid>
		<description>U will see I mean....t will be the last to have 4g</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U will see I mean&hellip;.t will be the last to have 4g</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mensahwatts</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/29/internal-t-mobile-doc-confirms-google-phone/#comment-72875</link>
		<dc:creator>Mensahwatts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 21:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=10106#comment-72875</guid>
		<description>@Paul...yeah and by that time the big V will be booming in there 4g and behind them everyone else but y mobile. Lol i will see....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Paul&hellip;yeah and by that time the big V will be booming in there 4g and behind them everyone else but y mobile. Lol i will see&hellip;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul S.</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/29/internal-t-mobile-doc-confirms-google-phone/#comment-72680</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=10106#comment-72680</guid>
		<description>TMo currently has 227 3g pops and promises 100 plus more by March which will then equal att&#039;s 3g footprint. At that time (March) they will turn on the 7.2 mbps service making them the fastest and equalling (if not surpassing) the nation&#039;s largest gsm 3g carrier. Never before has a carrier built a system so quickly and solidly (thank you DT). The next phase will take 7 months to initiate their 21 hsdpa service and THEN let&#039;s see the &quot;maps war&quot; !!! Thank you T-Mobile for becoming the nation&#039;s Best and Fastest network FIRST!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TMo currently has 227 3g pops and promises 100 plus more by March which will then equal att&rsquo;s 3g footprint. At that time (March) they will turn on the 7.2 mbps service making them the fastest and equalling (if not surpassing) the nation&rsquo;s largest gsm 3g carrier. Never before has a carrier built a system so quickly and solidly (thank you DT). The next phase will take 7 months to initiate their 21 hsdpa service and THEN let&rsquo;s see the &ldquo;maps war&rdquo; !!! Thank you T-Mobile for becoming the nation&rsquo;s Best and Fastest network FIRST!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ari-free</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/29/internal-t-mobile-doc-confirms-google-phone/#comment-72503</link>
		<dc:creator>ari-free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=10106#comment-72503</guid>
		<description>jer: &quot;TMO didn’t have 3G coverage up until September, but now they do and honestly there’s not many times where it matters that much outside a few apps.&quot;

those are probably google apps such as google nav and that matters a great deal for google!
I don&#039;t want to find myself stuck in the middle of NYC and not be able to get coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jer: &ldquo;TMO didn&rsquo;t have 3G coverage up until September, but now they do and honestly there&rsquo;s not many times where it matters that much outside a few apps.&rdquo;</p>
<p>those are probably google apps such as google nav and that matters a great deal for google!<br>
I don&rsquo;t want to find myself stuck in the middle of NYC and not be able to get coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mensahwatts</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/29/internal-t-mobile-doc-confirms-google-phone/#comment-72494</link>
		<dc:creator>Mensahwatts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=10106#comment-72494</guid>
		<description>Then again I could be wrong because ATT has been voted the worse cellphone  service many times in tech mags and they have iphone...which is a cellphone killa...well outside the blackberry it beats all other phones...in sells</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then again I could be wrong because ATT has been voted the worse cellphone  service many times in tech mags and they have iphone&hellip;which is a cellphone killa&hellip;well outside the blackberry it beats all other phones&hellip;in sells</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mensahwatts</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/29/internal-t-mobile-doc-confirms-google-phone/#comment-72492</link>
		<dc:creator>Mensahwatts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=10106#comment-72492</guid>
		<description>lol yeah if its on T-mobile only...then it can&#039;t be a heavy hitter regardless of a....handful of people who are good with there 3g covrege....and service</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol yeah if its on T-mobile only&hellip;then it can&rsquo;t be a heavy hitter regardless of a&hellip;.handful of people who are good with there 3g covrege&hellip;.and service</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Furyu</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/29/internal-t-mobile-doc-confirms-google-phone/#comment-72440</link>
		<dc:creator>Furyu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 05:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=10106#comment-72440</guid>
		<description>Ok I am confused. Does the unlocked version work on other carriers? Or does it only work on T-Mobile&#039;s network?

If so why what are the reasons for buying an unlocked phone for $350 more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok I am confused. Does the unlocked version work on other carriers? Or does it only work on T-Mobile&rsquo;s network?</p>
<p>If so why what are the reasons for buying an unlocked phone for $350 more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cwrig</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/29/internal-t-mobile-doc-confirms-google-phone/#comment-72406</link>
		<dc:creator>cwrig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 03:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=10106#comment-72406</guid>
		<description>@Matt W...Ever heard of the G1 or myTouch 3G? Oh yeah, huge failures . . .

They are.  They have sold a miniscule amount of volume compared to if they were on a larger carrier.   That was apprpropriate for the G1 as Google needed to test the waters in a low profile way.  Putting the G1 on TM was a good idea.  Putting a phone they want to compete with iphone on TM Only; really bad idea.   If Google is serious about this phone, it will work on 3G of other carriers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt W&hellip;Ever heard of the G1 or myTouch 3G? Oh yeah, huge failures . . .</p>
<p>They are.  They have sold a miniscule amount of volume compared to if they were on a larger carrier.   That was apprpropriate for the G1 as Google needed to test the waters in a low profile way.  Putting the G1 on TM was a good idea.  Putting a phone they want to compete with iphone on TM Only; really bad idea.   If Google is serious about this phone, it will work on 3G of other carriers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jer</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/29/internal-t-mobile-doc-confirms-google-phone/#comment-72397</link>
		<dc:creator>Jer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 03:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=10106#comment-72397</guid>
		<description>@ari-free and other TMO doubters.  I switched from the big red simply to get the first Android phone knowing they&#039;d eventually be available on Verizon, as an early adopter.  TMO didn&#039;t have 3G coverage up until September, but now they do and honestly there&#039;s not many times where it matters that much outside a few apps.  With that said I know there are so many other areas that are/were in the same boat with TMO 3G just arriving recently or about to.  They&#039;ve done a really good job, considering we didn&#039;t even have TMO in this state barely over a year ago.  Since being with them I have only great things to report.  They&#039;re customer service FAR trumps any carrier I&#039;ve been with (all of the others), I&#039;ve experienced only a handful of times where signal was lost and I&#039;m more than happy to pay almost HALF what I would for the same plan on big red.

Oh and: &quot;Most people won’t switch and lose coverage just for this phone.&quot;  As others are saying, there will be other phones in 2010 as well, and...  Ask anyone that switched to AT&amp;T for the iphone.  Loads of people are more than willing to gamble the carrier for a handset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ari-free and other TMO doubters.  I switched from the big red simply to get the first Android phone knowing they&rsquo;d eventually be available on Verizon, as an early adopter.  TMO didn&rsquo;t have 3G coverage up until September, but now they do and honestly there&rsquo;s not many times where it matters that much outside a few apps.  With that said I know there are so many other areas that are/were in the same boat with TMO 3G just arriving recently or about to.  They&rsquo;ve done a really good job, considering we didn&rsquo;t even have TMO in this state barely over a year ago.  Since being with them I have only great things to report.  They&rsquo;re customer service FAR trumps any carrier I&rsquo;ve been with (all of the others), I&rsquo;ve experienced only a handful of times where signal was lost and I&rsquo;m more than happy to pay almost HALF what I would for the same plan on big red.</p>
<p>Oh and: &ldquo;Most people won&rsquo;t switch and lose coverage just for this phone.&rdquo;  As others are saying, there will be other phones in 2010 as well, and&hellip;  Ask anyone that switched to AT&amp;T for the iphone.  Loads of people are more than willing to gamble the carrier for a handset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt W</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/29/internal-t-mobile-doc-confirms-google-phone/#comment-72382</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=10106#comment-72382</guid>
		<description>@cwrig . . . Ever heard of the G1 or myTouch 3G? Oh yeah, huge failures . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@cwrig . . . Ever heard of the G1 or myTouch 3G? Oh yeah, huge failures . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cwrig</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/29/internal-t-mobile-doc-confirms-google-phone/#comment-72368</link>
		<dc:creator>cwrig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=10106#comment-72368</guid>
		<description>Looks like a great phone; but its an automatic failure if its only available at 3G with T-mobile.  They have no coverage and no customers.  Google cant be this stupid.  The phone must be available at 3G with other carriers, or its a failure out of the gate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a great phone; but its an automatic failure if its only available at 3G with T-mobile.  They have no coverage and no customers.  Google cant be this stupid.  The phone must be available at 3G with other carriers, or its a failure out of the gate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ari-free</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/29/internal-t-mobile-doc-confirms-google-phone/#comment-72367</link>
		<dc:creator>ari-free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=10106#comment-72367</guid>
		<description>Mark: Nokia? Nokia doesn&#039;t have any play in the US</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark: Nokia? Nokia doesn&rsquo;t have any play in the US</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ari-free</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/29/internal-t-mobile-doc-confirms-google-phone/#comment-72366</link>
		<dc:creator>ari-free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=10106#comment-72366</guid>
		<description>Verizon may be expensive but why not Sprint? Most people won&#039;t switch and lose coverage just for this phone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verizon may be expensive but why not Sprint? Most people won&rsquo;t switch and lose coverage just for this phone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Palmos</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/29/internal-t-mobile-doc-confirms-google-phone/#comment-72362</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Palmos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=10106#comment-72362</guid>
		<description>Fantastic phone,
but 
NO FRONT CAMERA  :(
sheesh HTC, heard of Fring???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic phone,<br />
but<br />
NO FRONT CAMERA  :(<br />
sheesh HTC, heard of Fring???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.023 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 432/450 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: phandroid.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: phandroid.com @ 2012-05-27 16:35:13 -->
