<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kaspersky: Beware Malicious Android Programs In 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phandroid.com/2009/12/17/kaspersky-beware-malicious-android-programs-in-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/17/kaspersky-beware-malicious-android-programs-in-2010/</link>
	<description>Android Phone News, Rumors, Reviews, Apps, Forums &#38; More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 02:51:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/17/kaspersky-beware-malicious-android-programs-in-2010/#comment-83158</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=9644#comment-83158</guid>
		<description>The Android platform it has a very high risk potential in my opinion. This thing is happen because many people use their mobile devices to connect to sensible data, like bank account, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Android platform it has a very high risk potential in my opinion. This thing is happen because many people use their mobile devices to connect to sensible data, like bank account, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peer Propp</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/17/kaspersky-beware-malicious-android-programs-in-2010/#comment-75797</link>
		<dc:creator>Peer Propp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=9644#comment-75797</guid>
		<description>The Android market is fascinating isn&#039;t it?  Now even more confusing when you realize that Google didn&#039;t plan for customer care for the NexusOne.  Are they really the smartest guys in the room?  Check out my blog post on this market:  http://bit.ly/80XGOJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Android market is fascinating isn&rsquo;t it?  Now even more confusing when you realize that Google didn&rsquo;t plan for customer care for the NexusOne.  Are they really the smartest guys in the room?  Check out my blog post on this market:  <a href="http://bit.ly/80XGOJ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/80XGOJ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/17/kaspersky-beware-malicious-android-programs-in-2010/#comment-71930</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 17:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=9644#comment-71930</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s going to be hilarious the first time a big exploit gets abused on Android and Google realizes they don&#039;t have the any good method of pushing updates out to all devices. Many Android devices are only ever updated when connected to a PC and special software is run, something many owners will simply never do. Imagine Windows, but without Windows Update, without Windows Defender, and without third party anti-malware/spyware/virus apps.

The claim that Android apps are locked down doesn&#039;t even help. Web browsers are far more locked than Android apps and yet experience constant security problems requiring updates. Even ignoring exploits, there was a JavaScript virus on Reddit.com not that long ago. People who viewed pages infected by the virus were themselves infected and their account was then used to post more viral content to stories and messages.

This is why good web browsers have update checking built in and enabled by default. Android distributions, on the other hand, make it optional and dependent on who releases the phone. Good web browsers also check apps against an externally updated list of attack sites and malware. Depending on users to update is just too slow to keep up. Android doesn&#039;t even have this basic external list checking feature.

If Android ever becomes as popular as web browsers, the owners are in for a rude awakening due to the poor security planning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&rsquo;s going to be hilarious the first time a big exploit gets abused on Android and Google realizes they don&rsquo;t have the any good method of pushing updates out to all devices. Many Android devices are only ever updated when connected to a PC and special software is run, something many owners will simply never do. Imagine Windows, but without Windows Update, without Windows Defender, and without third party anti-malware/spyware/virus apps.</p>
<p>The claim that Android apps are locked down doesn&rsquo;t even help. Web browsers are far more locked than Android apps and yet experience constant security problems requiring updates. Even ignoring exploits, there was a JavaScript virus on Reddit.com not that long ago. People who viewed pages infected by the virus were themselves infected and their account was then used to post more viral content to stories and messages.</p>
<p>This is why good web browsers have update checking built in and enabled by default. Android distributions, on the other hand, make it optional and dependent on who releases the phone. Good web browsers also check apps against an externally updated list of attack sites and malware. Depending on users to update is just too slow to keep up. Android doesn&rsquo;t even have this basic external list checking feature.</p>
<p>If Android ever becomes as popular as web browsers, the owners are in for a rude awakening due to the poor security planning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Walters</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/17/kaspersky-beware-malicious-android-programs-in-2010/#comment-71021</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Walters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=9644#comment-71021</guid>
		<description>Ok,,, to those that said the sandbox will protect, and not allow a malicious app to steal information from another app, that is incorrect.

the app will set permissions during the install..
and if you look,, there are apps that intercept sms messages that are encrypted and take those and use them to control the phone.. such as the apps you would use for tracking your phone, you can even send an sms to your phone, the spy app can then poll gps, and poll phone state, and send an sms back to you with the location and even the new phone number of the phone if its been re-activated...

so yes,, malicious apps could be stealing your facebook password, your phone number, your location, your ip address.
there are a multitude of things that a lowsome person could use this for...

the things that worry me are
1. app that uses my sms and mms to spam other numbers ananonymously.
2. app that spams using my email. and ive seen this first hand. because I downloaded an app from the market, and after installing it, my facebook was then a fan of their developement team suddenly, and I also started receiving emails from the app developers about other apps I would probably like, now the problem with that is, that their app accessed my facebook some how and fanned me without my knowledge, and somehow retreived my primary email address on the phone...
3. making phone calls... and dont say it cant happen, because I use google voice, and that app has access to the phones api and can initiate a call, so it can happen.
4. monitoring your banking information or anything else you do on your droid.

this completely scares the crap out of me.. and what scares me even more, is I have not been able to find any type of network monitor, or kernel process monitor for the droid that allows you to see what apps are linking to. or doing with your network..
on my old winmo phone there was an app that would show all the dll`s, processes, and services and registry keys that a program was using, plus allowed you to monitor its network access..
now granted I know that android/linux is not windows mobile, but there would have to be a similar way to monitor what an app is doing. and these little antivirus progams that are in the market just seem like a joke..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok,,, to those that said the sandbox will protect, and not allow a malicious app to steal information from another app, that is incorrect.</p>
<p>the app will set permissions during the install..<br />
and if you look,, there are apps that intercept sms messages that are encrypted and take those and use them to control the phone.. such as the apps you would use for tracking your phone, you can even send an sms to your phone, the spy app can then poll gps, and poll phone state, and send an sms back to you with the location and even the new phone number of the phone if its been re-activated&#8230;</p>
<p>so yes,, malicious apps could be stealing your facebook password, your phone number, your location, your ip address.<br />
there are a multitude of things that a lowsome person could use this for&#8230;</p>
<p>the things that worry me are<br />
1. app that uses my sms and mms to spam other numbers ananonymously.<br />
2. app that spams using my email. and ive seen this first hand. because I downloaded an app from the market, and after installing it, my facebook was then a fan of their developement team suddenly, and I also started receiving emails from the app developers about other apps I would probably like, now the problem with that is, that their app accessed my facebook some how and fanned me without my knowledge, and somehow retreived my primary email address on the phone&#8230;<br />
3. making phone calls&#8230; and dont say it cant happen, because I use google voice, and that app has access to the phones api and can initiate a call, so it can happen.<br />
4. monitoring your banking information or anything else you do on your droid.</p>
<p>this completely scares the crap out of me.. and what scares me even more, is I have not been able to find any type of network monitor, or kernel process monitor for the droid that allows you to see what apps are linking to. or doing with your network..<br />
on my old winmo phone there was an app that would show all the dll`s, processes, and services and registry keys that a program was using, plus allowed you to monitor its network access..<br />
now granted I know that android/linux is not windows mobile, but there would have to be a similar way to monitor what an app is doing. and these little antivirus progams that are in the market just seem like a joke..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SK</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/17/kaspersky-beware-malicious-android-programs-in-2010/#comment-70939</link>
		<dc:creator>SK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 05:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=9644#comment-70939</guid>
		<description>I never said an antivirus program is useful. Just complaining that Google has left big security holes when it should be easy to fix them (at least point 2).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never said an antivirus program is useful. Just complaining that Google has left big security holes when it should be easy to fix them (at least point 2).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aleis</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/17/kaspersky-beware-malicious-android-programs-in-2010/#comment-70550</link>
		<dc:creator>aleis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=9644#comment-70550</guid>
		<description>either way SK, the anti virus program wouldnt detect anything like that. best to just do your sensitive transactions on a PC that you consider safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>either way SK, the anti virus program wouldnt detect anything like that. best to just do your sensitive transactions on a PC that you consider safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tristan</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/17/kaspersky-beware-malicious-android-programs-in-2010/#comment-70527</link>
		<dc:creator>tristan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=9644#comment-70527</guid>
		<description>you should be made aware that the dev&#039;s apps can run code within each other, and when you install an app that has a counterpart on your system it should list all the permissions for the currently installed + the one you are installing.  they should make apps to where enough 1 star ratings makes the app private and no longer in the list unless you search for the package... i really don&#039;t want to see UAC prompts on meh droid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you should be made aware that the dev&rsquo;s apps can run code within each other, and when you install an app that has a counterpart on your system it should list all the permissions for the currently installed + the one you are installing.  they should make apps to where enough 1 star ratings makes the app private and no longer in the list unless you search for the package&hellip; i really don&rsquo;t want to see UAC prompts on meh droid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rigamrts</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/17/kaspersky-beware-malicious-android-programs-in-2010/#comment-70457</link>
		<dc:creator>rigamrts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=9644#comment-70457</guid>
		<description>@sk but i&#039;m still not waisting my money on an unproven antivirus software since thier are no known viruses for android for them to protect us from. all we have is a trust us it works. but every other linux forum will tell you not to since there&#039;s no way for it to scan anything cause of the sandbox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sk but i&rsquo;m still not waisting my money on an unproven antivirus software since thier are no known viruses for android for them to protect us from. all we have is a trust us it works. but every other linux forum will tell you not to since there&rsquo;s no way for it to scan anything cause of the sandbox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SK</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/17/kaspersky-beware-malicious-android-programs-in-2010/#comment-70437</link>
		<dc:creator>SK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 03:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=9644#comment-70437</guid>
		<description>@Farch,

Read my earlier post on how just checking security permissions for internet access is not sufficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Farch,</p>
<p>Read my earlier post on how just checking security permissions for internet access is not sufficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rigamrts</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/17/kaspersky-beware-malicious-android-programs-in-2010/#comment-70433</link>
		<dc:creator>rigamrts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 03:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=9644#comment-70433</guid>
		<description>as far as programs on the market. google must do some type of check before it gets posted. cause if they did nothing they&#039;d be lyble for whatever that program does no matter how much they say otherwise. plus i remember google ripping down a few apps cause they did more than what they said. they did nothing bad just there was no full disclosure</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as far as programs on the market. google must do some type of check before it gets posted. cause if they did nothing they&rsquo;d be lyble for whatever that program does no matter how much they say otherwise. plus i remember google ripping down a few apps cause they did more than what they said. they did nothing bad just there was no full disclosure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SK</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/17/kaspersky-beware-malicious-android-programs-in-2010/#comment-70427</link>
		<dc:creator>SK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 03:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=9644#comment-70427</guid>
		<description>@SK, correction. I meant like My Tracks *without* internet access.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SK, correction. I meant like My Tracks *without* internet access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SK</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/17/kaspersky-beware-malicious-android-programs-in-2010/#comment-70426</link>
		<dc:creator>SK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 03:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=9644#comment-70426</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s really easy to steal info from an Android phone even with the current permissions implementation. Let me explain.

Say I&#039;m the bad guy. I will release App1 that has permissions to read some private info (say GPS location) and permissions to read/write to SD (say, like My Tracks with internet access). Another App2 that has internet permission (say to download feeds, pictures, etc) and read/write access to the SD (say to cache those feeds, pictures, etc).

Since I wrote both the apps (the developer name on the market could be different), I can make App1 write your current location to a particular file in the SD card, and App2 read it an transmit it to my website. So, separately, those 2 apps look harmless, but together, they can be used to track you current location.

There are 2 things that need to be done to fix this and Google hasn&#039;t implemented either one of them.
1. Implement Apps2SD so that the apps can use the SD to store cache info, etc, but still prevent one app from accessing the data of the other app.
2. Even if Apps2SD in implemented, one could easily write an App that can give a valid reason to access the internet (say, to check for updates) while accessing private info. Most of the apps do this already. If Google let the user selectively deny the requested permissions, then the user can still use the app without having to worry about the private info being uploaded. Say, it&#039;s a backup app that also lets you back up your phonebook to a remote server, if I can deny just the internet access, I can continue to use the app and be sure that my phonebook is not getting misused.

Hope someone from Google reads this and fixes these issues. The 2nd point is not really that difficult to implement. They just need to have this as an option under &quot;Manage applications&quot;.

-SK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really easy to steal info from an Android phone even with the current permissions implementation. Let me explain.</p>
<p>Say I&#8217;m the bad guy. I will release App1 that has permissions to read some private info (say GPS location) and permissions to read/write to SD (say, like My Tracks with internet access). Another App2 that has internet permission (say to download feeds, pictures, etc) and read/write access to the SD (say to cache those feeds, pictures, etc).</p>
<p>Since I wrote both the apps (the developer name on the market could be different), I can make App1 write your current location to a particular file in the SD card, and App2 read it an transmit it to my website. So, separately, those 2 apps look harmless, but together, they can be used to track you current location.</p>
<p>There are 2 things that need to be done to fix this and Google hasn&#8217;t implemented either one of them.<br />
1. Implement Apps2SD so that the apps can use the SD to store cache info, etc, but still prevent one app from accessing the data of the other app.<br />
2. Even if Apps2SD in implemented, one could easily write an App that can give a valid reason to access the internet (say, to check for updates) while accessing private info. Most of the apps do this already. If Google let the user selectively deny the requested permissions, then the user can still use the app without having to worry about the private info being uploaded. Say, it&#8217;s a backup app that also lets you back up your phonebook to a remote server, if I can deny just the internet access, I can continue to use the app and be sure that my phonebook is not getting misused.</p>
<p>Hope someone from Google reads this and fixes these issues. The 2nd point is not really that difficult to implement. They just need to have this as an option under &#8220;Manage applications&#8221;.</p>
<p>-SK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carig</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/17/kaspersky-beware-malicious-android-programs-in-2010/#comment-70399</link>
		<dc:creator>Carig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=9644#comment-70399</guid>
		<description>@Dianne

You&#039;re probably right, I was thinking more along the lines of and app doing more than it says it does. Virus was not the right word, I meant malware. But I guess the apps would have to ask for permission and although they could easily fool some people into giving permission there&#039;s probably not really any way software could tell a malicious action from a feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dianne</p>
<p>You&rsquo;re probably right, I was thinking more along the lines of and app doing more than it says it does. Virus was not the right word, I meant malware. But I guess the apps would have to ask for permission and although they could easily fool some people into giving permission there&rsquo;s probably not really any way software could tell a malicious action from a feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dianne</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/17/kaspersky-beware-malicious-android-programs-in-2010/#comment-70380</link>
		<dc:creator>Dianne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=9644#comment-70380</guid>
		<description>&quot;Google should do a virus scan on all apps before they are allowed into the market.&quot;

As far as I know, no known viruses exist.  What should Google scan for?

Also the security design of Android should hopefully make these kinds of programs much less feasible.  Consider a virus...  it replicates itself to other devices without the user being involved...  but on Android an application can not install any other software outside of its sandbox without the user being involved.  So if a virus is written, it is finding a way around the security system, so the fix is a security update to plug that hole rather than scanning for the virus.

There are of course lots of things apps can maliciously do still, but most of these on Android should be more in the realm of malware than viruses.

(Of course if you are running a rooted phone where you have allowed apps to be installed as root, that is a perfect virus attack vector.  Be careful!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&ldquo;Google should do a virus scan on all apps before they are allowed into the market.&rdquo;</p>
<p>As far as I know, no known viruses exist.  What should Google scan for?</p>
<p>Also the security design of Android should hopefully make these kinds of programs much less feasible.  Consider a virus&hellip;  it replicates itself to other devices without the user being involved&hellip;  but on Android an application can not install any other software outside of its sandbox without the user being involved.  So if a virus is written, it is finding a way around the security system, so the fix is a security update to plug that hole rather than scanning for the virus.</p>
<p>There are of course lots of things apps can maliciously do still, but most of these on Android should be more in the realm of malware than viruses.</p>
<p>(Of course if you are running a rooted phone where you have allowed apps to be installed as root, that is a perfect virus attack vector.  Be careful!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carig</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/17/kaspersky-beware-malicious-android-programs-in-2010/#comment-70363</link>
		<dc:creator>Carig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=9644#comment-70363</guid>
		<description>Google should do a virus scan on all apps before they are allowed into the market. That doesn&#039;t take that much time or manpower and people who are willing to be the first to try out an app shouldn&#039;t be guinea pigs to find out if it&#039;s malware.
.
I know they&#039;re going for a hands-off approach to the market, but this seems like something everyone could agree on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google should do a virus scan on all apps before they are allowed into the market. That doesn&#8217;t take that much time or manpower and people who are willing to be the first to try out an app shouldn&#8217;t be guinea pigs to find out if it&#8217;s malware.<br />
.<br />
I know they&#8217;re going for a hands-off approach to the market, but this seems like something everyone could agree on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.025 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 432/450 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: phandroid.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: phandroid.com @ 2012-05-27 17:06:34 -->
