<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wind River Announces Android Platform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phandroid.com/2009/12/08/wind-river-announces-android-platform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/08/wind-river-announces-android-platform/</link>
	<description>Android Phone News, Rumors, Reviews, Apps, Forums &#38; More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 02:51:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThinkOpenly</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/08/wind-river-announces-android-platform/#comment-67575</link>
		<dc:creator>ThinkOpenly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=9041#comment-67575</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure it was inevitable, but having the closed Flash platform available on the open Android platform is disappointing.  Flash either needs to become open (unlikely), or needs to be replaced.  HTML5, anyone?  Let&#039;s kill Flash while we still can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&rsquo;m sure it was inevitable, but having the closed Flash platform available on the open Android platform is disappointing.  Flash either needs to become open (unlikely), or needs to be replaced.  HTML5, anyone?  Let&rsquo;s kill Flash while we still can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chewtoy</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/08/wind-river-announces-android-platform/#comment-67065</link>
		<dc:creator>chewtoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=9041#comment-67065</guid>
		<description>Personally I think that&#039;s a sign that Google isn&#039;t doing the job I think most of us assumed they would take as their primary focus: shepherding packaging of Android with community contributions into an easily consumed, appealing-to-the-ODMs-and-carrier bundle.

But then again, I think we already have ample evidence of that.  Every single time I see a phone come out with changes to the OS beyond inclusion of some bookmarks, visual voicemail, and carrier billing, I just want to scream.

This platform is *never* going to surpass iphoneOS with this approach. :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I think that&rsquo;s a sign that Google isn&rsquo;t doing the job I think most of us assumed they would take as their primary focus: shepherding packaging of Android with community contributions into an easily consumed, appealing-to-the-ODMs-and-carrier bundle.</p>
<p>But then again, I think we already have ample evidence of that.  Every single time I see a phone come out with changes to the OS beyond inclusion of some bookmarks, visual voicemail, and carrier billing, I just want to scream.</p>
<p>This platform is *never* going to surpass iphoneOS with this approach. :-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ari-free</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/08/wind-river-announces-android-platform/#comment-67039</link>
		<dc:creator>ari-free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=9041#comment-67039</guid>
		<description>this &#039;microsoftizes&#039; Android so that it is a compelling alternative to WinMo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this &lsquo;microsoftizes&rsquo; Android so that it is a compelling alternative to WinMo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/08/wind-river-announces-android-platform/#comment-66937</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=9041#comment-66937</guid>
		<description>I love my Droid, but I actually /am/ starting to get worried about the fragmentation of the platform.  Go hang out on android-developers; you&#039;ll see many, many various threads about how x-and-such doesn&#039;t work right on the Cliq, or the Hero, or whatever, and some desperate developer going, &#039;Hey, I don&#039;t have Device X, and I&#039;m getting reports that my app crashes on that.  Anyone out there know why this is, since I don&#039;t have one to debug on?&#039;

There are /already/ headaches for Android developers in supporting the many different types of hardware and the slight variations in software.  (HTC seems to have broken part of the Market on the Hero, for instance.)  So while I think Wind River&#039;s going to provide a good platform, this will still be Yet One More new set of variables into Android development.  And then handset manufacturers and carriers will STILL want to do customization to differentiate their Android phone from others, and so the fragmentation continues.

While this announcement is cool, I do also find the continuing fragmentation worrisome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love my Droid, but I actually /am/ starting to get worried about the fragmentation of the platform.  Go hang out on android-developers; you&rsquo;ll see many, many various threads about how x-and-such doesn&rsquo;t work right on the Cliq, or the Hero, or whatever, and some desperate developer going, &lsquo;Hey, I don&rsquo;t have Device X, and I&rsquo;m getting reports that my app crashes on that.  Anyone out there know why this is, since I don&rsquo;t have one to debug on?&rsquo;</p>
<p>There are /already/ headaches for Android developers in supporting the many different types of hardware and the slight variations in software.  (HTC seems to have broken part of the Market on the Hero, for instance.)  So while I think Wind River&rsquo;s going to provide a good platform, this will still be Yet One More new set of variables into Android development.  And then handset manufacturers and carriers will STILL want to do customization to differentiate their Android phone from others, and so the fragmentation continues.</p>
<p>While this announcement is cool, I do also find the continuing fragmentation worrisome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/08/wind-river-announces-android-platform/#comment-66929</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=9041#comment-66929</guid>
		<description>Well Wind River is part of the OHA ... so they can&#039;t do anything that causes fragmentation to the ANdroid platform.. all the oha members have signed on the dotted line about that issue.. 

I want screen shots and vids... how will they port this to devices?  Can the end user get it.. or is this an OEM ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Wind River is part of the OHA &hellip; so they can&rsquo;t do anything that causes fragmentation to the ANdroid platform.. all the oha members have signed on the dotted line about that issue.. </p>
<p>I want screen shots and vids&hellip; how will they port this to devices?  Can the end user get it.. or is this an OEM ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/12/08/wind-river-announces-android-platform/#comment-66907</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=9041#comment-66907</guid>
		<description>Pretty interesting. Since Android is open I don&#039;t see any drawback off the bat. They can&#039;t close it up. If it brings more stability and support for the platform then it could push adoption even further (as if its lagging to begin with). I&#039;m thinking enterprise. They&#039;ll probably do alot of integration of components seen as important for enterprise adoption and maybe give it a more professional (read stuffy) interface as well. I see it as a downstream polish type of thing as Ubuntu is to Debian and Mint is to Ubuntu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty interesting. Since Android is open I don&rsquo;t see any drawback off the bat. They can&rsquo;t close it up. If it brings more stability and support for the platform then it could push adoption even further (as if its lagging to begin with). I&rsquo;m thinking enterprise. They&rsquo;ll probably do alot of integration of components seen as important for enterprise adoption and maybe give it a more professional (read stuffy) interface as well. I see it as a downstream polish type of thing as Ubuntu is to Debian and Mint is to Ubuntu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 334/335 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: phandroid.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: phandroid.com @ 2012-02-13 19:16:49 -->
