<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Motorola Backflip Gets Rumored Specs, New Name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phandroid.com/2009/11/20/motorola-backflip-gets-rumored-specs-new-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/20/motorola-backflip-gets-rumored-specs-new-name/</link>
	<description>Android Phone News, Rumors, Reviews, Apps, Forums &#38; More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:14:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wilco</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/20/motorola-backflip-gets-rumored-specs-new-name/#comment-74096</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=8158#comment-74096</guid>
		<description>I agree, Joshua. The memory specs are a nominal offering, but the processor is less than nominal. Maybe this is for teens? But as a T-MO customer, give me shit I want!! N1 is a great start. Droid would be fine too. X10, and that sort of spec. Otherwise, don&#039;t bother me, I&#039;ve got a 14 month old G1, rooted and running like it was 2009. Don&#039;t give me G1 specs anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Joshua. The memory specs are a nominal offering, but the processor is less than nominal. Maybe this is for teens? But as a T-MO customer, give me shit I want!! N1 is a great start. Droid would be fine too. X10, and that sort of spec. Otherwise, don&#8217;t bother me, I&#8217;ve got a 14 month old G1, rooted and running like it was 2009. Don&#8217;t give me G1 specs anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motorola Backflip/Enzo Pictures &#38; Details! &#124; Android Phone Fans</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/20/motorola-backflip-gets-rumored-specs-new-name/#comment-69645</link>
		<dc:creator>Motorola Backflip/Enzo Pictures &#38; Details! &#124; Android Phone Fans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=8158#comment-69645</guid>
		<description>[...] anonymous tipster that will leave you doing backflips&#8230; or, uh&#8230; Enzos. If you remember our first Motorola Backflip article, you&#8217;ll remember a unique/odd form factor that left people guessing exactly how it would [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] anonymous tipster that will leave you doing backflips&#8230; or, uh&#8230; Enzos. If you remember our first Motorola Backflip article, you&#8217;ll remember a unique/odd form factor that left people guessing exactly how it would [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/20/motorola-backflip-gets-rumored-specs-new-name/#comment-66996</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=8158#comment-66996</guid>
		<description>Same shoddy processor, WTF you cheap bastards, a god damn Zune comes with Tegra. Decent proc, 3.5mm headset, led flash with a decent camera, how god damn hard is that to do? every Android phone on the market is an almost coulda been great if we just hadn&#039;t been so damn cheap with the hardware. Droid is almost there but the stupid asymetrical lip bugs me and giving me the same proc from the iphone 2yrs later when it&#039;s about to come out with an even faster one? Stop playing grab ass and gimme a phone I actually want to pay for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same shoddy processor, WTF you cheap bastards, a god damn Zune comes with Tegra. Decent proc, 3.5mm headset, led flash with a decent camera, how god damn hard is that to do? every Android phone on the market is an almost coulda been great if we just hadn&#8217;t been so damn cheap with the hardware. Droid is almost there but the stupid asymetrical lip bugs me and giving me the same proc from the iphone 2yrs later when it&#8217;s about to come out with an even faster one? Stop playing grab ass and gimme a phone I actually want to pay for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/20/motorola-backflip-gets-rumored-specs-new-name/#comment-63365</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=8158#comment-63365</guid>
		<description>Radaroid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radaroid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannyDarko</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/20/motorola-backflip-gets-rumored-specs-new-name/#comment-62702</link>
		<dc:creator>DannyDarko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=8158#comment-62702</guid>
		<description>I think the phone design is cool in theory its obvious that it flips out from the back since you can see the camera top left hand corner but, how practical is that if it&#039;s in your pocket? Besides that the obvious lack of updated K.C., anything less than 2.0 is ridiculous at this point</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the phone design is cool in theory its obvious that it flips out from the back since you can see the camera top left hand corner but, how practical is that if it&#8217;s in your pocket? Besides that the obvious lack of updated K.C., anything less than 2.0 is ridiculous at this point</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bennett</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/20/motorola-backflip-gets-rumored-specs-new-name/#comment-62614</link>
		<dc:creator>Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=8158#comment-62614</guid>
		<description>This is the name hold me too it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the name hold me too it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix M</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/20/motorola-backflip-gets-rumored-specs-new-name/#comment-62328</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=8158#comment-62328</guid>
		<description>DONT COME TO TMO
dont need any more sh@%ty moto blur phones
We need sum sense and or eclair</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DONT COME TO TMO<br />
dont need any more sh@%ty moto blur phones<br />
We need sum sense and or eclair</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Usman</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/20/motorola-backflip-gets-rumored-specs-new-name/#comment-62298</link>
		<dc:creator>Usman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=8158#comment-62298</guid>
		<description>So it looks like the Moto Cliq... and it has the same specs as the Moto Cliq.  It&#039;s also running Android 1.5 with MotoBlur...like the Moto Cliq.

Does anyone else see a problem here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it looks like the Moto Cliq&#8230; and it has the same specs as the Moto Cliq.  It&#8217;s also running Android 1.5 with MotoBlur&#8230;like the Moto Cliq.</p>
<p>Does anyone else see a problem here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/20/motorola-backflip-gets-rumored-specs-new-name/#comment-62206</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=8158#comment-62206</guid>
		<description>Mr.Motus knew too much, he had to go...
The backflip was just a cool way :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr.Motus knew too much, he had to go&#8230;<br />
The backflip was just a cool way :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yousif</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/20/motorola-backflip-gets-rumored-specs-new-name/#comment-62198</link>
		<dc:creator>Yousif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=8158#comment-62198</guid>
		<description>Roidar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roidar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaneaus</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/20/motorola-backflip-gets-rumored-specs-new-name/#comment-62155</link>
		<dc:creator>shaneaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=8158#comment-62155</guid>
		<description>I doubt the specs will keep the ATT 3G bands if it goes to T-Mobile.  However, if it does...  I&#039;ll pick one up as I&#039;m still stuck on ATT&#039;s Edge with my G1.  Why still on ATT?  Here in Austin, Texas ATT has the best coverage for talking int he rural areas (where I work).  Co-workers with T-mobile and Verizon keep dropping calls (although Verizon has the best data coverage IMHO).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt the specs will keep the ATT 3G bands if it goes to T-Mobile.  However, if it does&#8230;  I&#8217;ll pick one up as I&#8217;m still stuck on ATT&#8217;s Edge with my G1.  Why still on ATT?  Here in Austin, Texas ATT has the best coverage for talking int he rural areas (where I work).  Co-workers with T-mobile and Verizon keep dropping calls (although Verizon has the best data coverage IMHO).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominique</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/20/motorola-backflip-gets-rumored-specs-new-name/#comment-62122</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=8158#comment-62122</guid>
		<description>So, the specs basically look more like what the G1 should have been (more ram, more rom, wcdma for both T-Mobile and AT&amp;T, and a little nicer looking).  Not enough to make me upgrade my G1...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, the specs basically look more like what the G1 should have been (more ram, more rom, wcdma for both T-Mobile and AT&amp;T, and a little nicer looking).  Not enough to make me upgrade my G1&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/20/motorola-backflip-gets-rumored-specs-new-name/#comment-62114</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=8158#comment-62114</guid>
		<description>Droid-Dar is the best of the puns I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Droid-Dar is the best of the puns I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
