<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung Says Bada Bing, I Say Nada Boom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phandroid.com/2009/11/11/samsung-says-bada-bing-i-say-nada-boom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/11/samsung-says-bada-bing-i-say-nada-boom/</link>
	<description>Android Phone News, Rumors, Reviews, Apps, Forums &#38; More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 02:51:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Market Watcher</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/11/samsung-says-bada-bing-i-say-nada-boom/#comment-67175</link>
		<dc:creator>Market Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 06:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=7614#comment-67175</guid>
		<description>I found that ....Where&#039;s bada from...this report seems to explain the structure of bada...go to www.yonkukenkyu.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found that &hellip;.Where&rsquo;s bada from&hellip;this report seems to explain the structure of bada&hellip;go to <a href="http://www.yonkukenkyu.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.yonkukenkyu.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cthulhu</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/11/samsung-says-bada-bing-i-say-nada-boom/#comment-60189</link>
		<dc:creator>Cthulhu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=7614#comment-60189</guid>
		<description>What people seems to missing here is the fact that Samsung already has a few phones running Linux. The Samsung Omnia and Mirage for instance (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LiMo_Foundation#Samsung). What I think Samsung is doing with Bada is taking the experience and results they already have and give it a proper name and try to create some hype about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What people seems to missing here is the fact that Samsung already has a few phones running Linux. The Samsung Omnia and Mirage for instance (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LiMo_Foundation#Samsung" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LiMo_Foundation#Samsung</a>). What I think Samsung is doing with Bada is taking the experience and results they already have and give it a proper name and try to create some hype about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/11/samsung-says-bada-bing-i-say-nada-boom/#comment-60008</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=7614#comment-60008</guid>
		<description>@ bill:
The author states in the sentence before, he&#039;s speaking &quot;in terms of adoption&quot;
Number of users not comparing the efficiency of the os.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ bill:<br />
The author states in the sentence before, he&#8217;s speaking &#8220;in terms of adoption&#8221;<br />
Number of users not comparing the efficiency of the os.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/11/samsung-says-bada-bing-i-say-nada-boom/#comment-59945</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=7614#comment-59945</guid>
		<description>I would like to know why the author considers webOS to be WAY behind Android?  I know it still needs to be polished a bit, but the way it handles multitasking is phenomenal (no phone comes even close to this), as well as the notifications.  To just make a blanket statement like that is a little weak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to know why the author considers webOS to be WAY behind Android?  I know it still needs to be polished a bit, but the way it handles multitasking is phenomenal (no phone comes even close to this), as well as the notifications.  To just make a blanket statement like that is a little weak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: testman</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/11/samsung-says-bada-bing-i-say-nada-boom/#comment-59725</link>
		<dc:creator>testman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=7614#comment-59725</guid>
		<description>It is either a smart move or a suicide. At this time I am just questioned.

Personally, I regret to bought a Samsung Android phone ... looking at what others manufacturers are bringing, I see that Samsung is going their own way and that they will not have much Android future. On my Samsung Galaxy, there is no 1.6 update, and little chance to get 2.0 update. No, Samsung is not playing the real opensource game.

That might be the reason they want to jump of the ship.

Fine, but ey guys, where are you going to get your applications from ? I mean, sure you will get zillion of Korean applications for Korean ... but I don&#039;t think you will get much european :(

Android is easy to developwith thanks to Java. There are already plenty of application for almost anything on earth on Android. And at the given current pace, I do think in a couple of years (thanks to Apple policy and lack of Java support), Android will be the #1.

Is Samsung afraid of competition ? This is verry surprising, they got the best screen, almost best processors (ask Apple), ... only bad designers (samsung mobile are not sexy or modern at all).

Anyway, between plan and reality there is a huge gap. And if Samsung android phone soutperforms they own OS, then be sure this OS will be specified for low-value phones ...

Android is realy chalenging the manufacturers and that bring innovation to a quite &quot;calm&quot; market :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is either a smart move or a suicide. At this time I am just questioned.</p>
<p>Personally, I regret to bought a Samsung Android phone &hellip; looking at what others manufacturers are bringing, I see that Samsung is going their own way and that they will not have much Android future. On my Samsung Galaxy, there is no 1.6 update, and little chance to get 2.0 update. No, Samsung is not playing the real opensource game.</p>
<p>That might be the reason they want to jump of the ship.</p>
<p>Fine, but ey guys, where are you going to get your applications from ? I mean, sure you will get zillion of Korean applications for Korean &hellip; but I don&rsquo;t think you will get much european :(</p>
<p>Android is easy to developwith thanks to Java. There are already plenty of application for almost anything on earth on Android. And at the given current pace, I do think in a couple of years (thanks to Apple policy and lack of Java support), Android will be the #1.</p>
<p>Is Samsung afraid of competition ? This is verry surprising, they got the best screen, almost best processors (ask Apple), &hellip; only bad designers (samsung mobile are not sexy or modern at all).</p>
<p>Anyway, between plan and reality there is a huge gap. And if Samsung android phone soutperforms they own OS, then be sure this OS will be specified for low-value phones &hellip;</p>
<p>Android is realy chalenging the manufacturers and that bring innovation to a quite &ldquo;calm&rdquo; market :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luke</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/11/samsung-says-bada-bing-i-say-nada-boom/#comment-59717</link>
		<dc:creator>luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=7614#comment-59717</guid>
		<description>Put this one in the same file as Nintendo Virtual Boy.

I wonder if Samsung&#039;s &quot;revolutionary&quot; cube interface will be the centerpiece?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Put this one in the same file as Nintendo Virtual Boy.</p>
<p>I wonder if Samsung&rsquo;s &ldquo;revolutionary&rdquo; cube interface will be the centerpiece?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/11/samsung-says-bada-bing-i-say-nada-boom/#comment-59645</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=7614#comment-59645</guid>
		<description>Foret it. What I like in samsung is OLED screens.
Either samsung ofer me a decent Android phone, or I&#039;ll buy an LCD phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foret it. What I like in samsung is OLED screens.<br />
Either samsung ofer me a decent Android phone, or I&#8217;ll buy an LCD phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kidphat</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/11/samsung-says-bada-bing-i-say-nada-boom/#comment-59642</link>
		<dc:creator>kidphat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=7614#comment-59642</guid>
		<description>@kobor42, thanks for the morning chuckle. That pretty much sums up Samsung&#039;s position. This might have be understandable when iPhone was the only fully functional mobile OS on the market, which isn&#039;t accessible to other manufacturers. Even *IF* they can get something as good as Android, the competition has some just as good for FREE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kobor42, thanks for the morning chuckle. That pretty much sums up Samsung&rsquo;s position. This might have be understandable when iPhone was the only fully functional mobile OS on the market, which isn&rsquo;t accessible to other manufacturers. Even *IF* they can get something as good as Android, the competition has some just as good for FREE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carig</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/11/samsung-says-bada-bing-i-say-nada-boom/#comment-59629</link>
		<dc:creator>Carig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=7614#comment-59629</guid>
		<description>well at least this should force google to keep improving android if they want samsung to keep using it, that&#039;s a good thing if you ask me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well at least this should force google to keep improving android if they want samsung to keep using it, that&rsquo;s a good thing if you ask me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kobor42</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/11/samsung-says-bada-bing-i-say-nada-boom/#comment-59601</link>
		<dc:creator>kobor42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=7614#comment-59601</guid>
		<description>*Sigh*

I do think Samsung knows what he does.

There will always be huge demand for cheap, brick-like phones. Android is not for that.

Android is fully configurable, shiny-flashy, with quite high hardware requirements. 

And google doesn&#039;t intend to lower this.
And this is a good thing. WE - the androiders/smartphoners - don&#039;t need bricks.

But my Mom does. And my Father too. And my Sister too. And my boss couldn&#039;t handle the goodies of such a good mobile - even if she x-) could afford an expensive one.

So the mass market demands low requirements, support for off-standard chipsets, Wifi-less, GPS-less, Cam-less bricks.

For smartphones, we have the perfect OS. For everything else, there is BadA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Sigh*</p>
<p>I do think Samsung knows what he does.</p>
<p>There will always be huge demand for cheap, brick-like phones. Android is not for that.</p>
<p>Android is fully configurable, shiny-flashy, with quite high hardware requirements. </p>
<p>And google doesn&#8217;t intend to lower this.<br />
And this is a good thing. WE &#8211; the androiders/smartphoners &#8211; don&#8217;t need bricks.</p>
<p>But my Mom does. And my Father too. And my Sister too. And my boss couldn&#8217;t handle the goodies of such a good mobile &#8211; even if she x-) could afford an expensive one.</p>
<p>So the mass market demands low requirements, support for off-standard chipsets, Wifi-less, GPS-less, Cam-less bricks.</p>
<p>For smartphones, we have the perfect OS. For everything else, there is BadA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/11/samsung-says-bada-bing-i-say-nada-boom/#comment-59584</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=7614#comment-59584</guid>
		<description>*sigh*  I swear these phone manufacturers aren&#039;t listening to consumers!  Why in the hell would Samsung try to fragment the mobile OS world yet again with yet ANOTHER mobile operating system.  If WebOS couldn&#039;t really take off and it&#039;s a pretty nice OS (thought it needs to mature a little) why in the hell would Samsung think they could pull it off.

I agree, I think everyone is watching Android.  The smart ones are saying, time to jump on the bandwagon.  The others see this as an opportunity to compete based on Android&#039;s success.  Samsung better stick to producing Android phones and if necessary try putting a pretty front-end on it (as long as it&#039;s not Touch-Wiz, yuck).  I mean think about it, if Windows Mobile is struggling to make a come back (yeah yeah WM 7 right, sure) why does Samsung think they can just jump in.  

The biggest problem will be developer support!  Which is the real reason WebOS isn&#039;t taking off, evident by their 300-something apps which are mostly flash cards and tip calculators.  I mean I&#039;m sure we can all use flash cards right?  Devs are flocking to the OS with the largest target audience and the OS with a little bit of cool factor to them (iPhone, Android).  Evident by the decline in WM apps and hardware.  If Palm&#039;s WebOS couldn&#039;t take off (still early for Palm though) given it&#039;s slick user interface which is semi-comparable to the iPhone I doubt Samsung&#039;s Bada-Doom is going to take off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*sigh*  I swear these phone manufacturers aren&rsquo;t listening to consumers!  Why in the hell would Samsung try to fragment the mobile OS world yet again with yet ANOTHER mobile operating system.  If WebOS couldn&rsquo;t really take off and it&rsquo;s a pretty nice OS (thought it needs to mature a little) why in the hell would Samsung think they could pull it off.</p>
<p>I agree, I think everyone is watching Android.  The smart ones are saying, time to jump on the bandwagon.  The others see this as an opportunity to compete based on Android&rsquo;s success.  Samsung better stick to producing Android phones and if necessary try putting a pretty front-end on it (as long as it&rsquo;s not Touch-Wiz, yuck).  I mean think about it, if Windows Mobile is struggling to make a come back (yeah yeah WM 7 right, sure) why does Samsung think they can just jump in.  </p>
<p>The biggest problem will be developer support!  Which is the real reason WebOS isn&rsquo;t taking off, evident by their 300-something apps which are mostly flash cards and tip calculators.  I mean I&rsquo;m sure we can all use flash cards right?  Devs are flocking to the OS with the largest target audience and the OS with a little bit of cool factor to them (iPhone, Android).  Evident by the decline in WM apps and hardware.  If Palm&rsquo;s WebOS couldn&rsquo;t take off (still early for Palm though) given it&rsquo;s slick user interface which is semi-comparable to the iPhone I doubt Samsung&rsquo;s Bada-Doom is going to take off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: some1</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/11/samsung-says-bada-bing-i-say-nada-boom/#comment-59582</link>
		<dc:creator>some1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=7614#comment-59582</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t worry about it.

It is the &quot;in thing&quot; to have an &quot;open&quot; phone operating system.

Samsung are like the stupid kid trying to copy their bigger brother Google who they wish they could be like.

Thankfully Samsung aren&#039;t retarded like Nokia and are hedging their bets for when the epic fail inevitably occurs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&rsquo;t worry about it.</p>
<p>It is the &ldquo;in thing&rdquo; to have an &ldquo;open&rdquo; phone operating system.</p>
<p>Samsung are like the stupid kid trying to copy their bigger brother Google who they wish they could be like.</p>
<p>Thankfully Samsung aren&rsquo;t retarded like Nokia and are hedging their bets for when the epic fail inevitably occurs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Droidz</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/11/samsung-says-bada-bing-i-say-nada-boom/#comment-59547</link>
		<dc:creator>Droidz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=7614#comment-59547</guid>
		<description>The success of Android might embolden Samsung doing this, but I think it&#039;ll be DOA. I used to be a fan of Nokia and Samsung, but I&#039;m not a fan of proprietary. Android is the first true open OS that can compete and get the sizable market share for all developers to support. Keep in mind that Google doesn&#039;t make any money on its Android market place, just to get carrier support. Google does not (currently) competing with manufacturer and carrier, making it easier to gain their support. Lacking those, I don&#039;t think Android would have succeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The success of Android might embolden Samsung doing this, but I think it&rsquo;ll be DOA. I used to be a fan of Nokia and Samsung, but I&rsquo;m not a fan of proprietary. Android is the first true open OS that can compete and get the sizable market share for all developers to support. Keep in mind that Google doesn&rsquo;t make any money on its Android market place, just to get carrier support. Google does not (currently) competing with manufacturer and carrier, making it easier to gain their support. Lacking those, I don&rsquo;t think Android would have succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HaL</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/11/11/samsung-says-bada-bing-i-say-nada-boom/#comment-59544</link>
		<dc:creator>HaL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=7614#comment-59544</guid>
		<description>Way to call it guys. Samsung is crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to call it guys. Samsung is crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 7/9 queries in 0.025 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 421/439 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: phandroid.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: phandroid.com @ 2012-05-27 08:38:22 -->
