<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung Behold 2 Passes FCC with 1000 mAh Battery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phandroid.com/2009/09/29/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc-with-1000-mah-battery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/09/29/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc-with-1000-mah-battery/</link>
	<description>Android Phone News, Rumors, Reviews, Apps, Forums &#38; More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 02:51:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Sitzman</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/09/29/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc-with-1000-mah-battery/#comment-56384</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Sitzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=5686#comment-56384</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve actually had a chance to test-drive the Behold 2 and specifically looked at the battery.  It&#039;s 1500 mAh, not 1000 or 1100.  This phone will have perfectly viable battery life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&rsquo;ve actually had a chance to test-drive the Behold 2 and specifically looked at the battery.  It&rsquo;s 1500 mAh, not 1000 or 1100.  This phone will have perfectly viable battery life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/09/29/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc-with-1000-mah-battery/#comment-56357</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=5686#comment-56357</guid>
		<description>Looks like it will be shipping stateside with a 1100mAh battery: http://wangmei.en.china.cn/selling-leads/detail,1089997861,Samsung-T939-Behold-2-Mobile-Phone.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like it will be shipping stateside with a 1100mAh battery: <a href="http://wangmei.en.china.cn/selling-leads/detail,1089997861,Samsung-T939-Behold-2-Mobile-Phone.html" rel="nofollow">http://wangmei.en.china.cn/selling-leads/detail,1089997861,Samsung-T939-Behold-2-Mobile-Phone.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/09/29/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc-with-1000-mah-battery/#comment-51552</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 04:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=5686#comment-51552</guid>
		<description>I agree.  I looked at the docs, and saw some references to 1000mA, but not 1000mAh.  Which doc and what page/paragraph?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  I looked at the docs, and saw some references to 1000mA, but not 1000mAh.  Which doc and what page/paragraph?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreaming Sky</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/09/29/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc-with-1000-mah-battery/#comment-51183</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreaming Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 05:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=5686#comment-51183</guid>
		<description>Where in the documentation did you see an indication of the battery&#039;s capacity?  I searched, but am new to FCC documentation and couldn&#039;t find it.  This device appears to be a slightly Americanized version of the GT-i7500 Galaxy, which had a 1400 MaH battery if I remember right.  I would be truly shocked if the battery capacity were cut so severely for introduction into a new market, especially one which has plenty of active 3G users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where in the documentation did you see an indication of the battery&rsquo;s capacity?  I searched, but am new to FCC documentation and couldn&rsquo;t find it.  This device appears to be a slightly Americanized version of the GT-i7500 Galaxy, which had a 1400 MaH battery if I remember right.  I would be truly shocked if the battery capacity were cut so severely for introduction into a new market, especially one which has plenty of active 3G users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/09/29/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc-with-1000-mah-battery/#comment-50458</link>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=5686#comment-50458</guid>
		<description>Agree with Ben.  Eventhough it&#039;s ONLY a 1000mAh battery the OLED screen uses about a third of a regular LCD screens power, so with a smaller battery and slimmer form factor, the usage should be on par with other devices, if not even a little better.  

Now I will caveat that with, &quot;it also depends on the processor speed&quot; which at this point is unknown but if it the same as the i7500 galaxy then it the 528mhz, which is too bad because the new Android Samsung moment for Sprint is going to have a 800mhz proc. If only the Behold had that proc too, but I doubt it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Ben.  Eventhough it&rsquo;s ONLY a 1000mAh battery the OLED screen uses about a third of a regular LCD screens power, so with a smaller battery and slimmer form factor, the usage should be on par with other devices, if not even a little better.  </p>
<p>Now I will caveat that with, &ldquo;it also depends on the processor speed&rdquo; which at this point is unknown but if it the same as the i7500 galaxy then it the 528mhz, which is too bad because the new Android Samsung moment for Sprint is going to have a 800mhz proc. If only the Behold had that proc too, but I doubt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/09/29/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc-with-1000-mah-battery/#comment-48999</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=5686#comment-48999</guid>
		<description>Do not dismiss the potential power savings of the AMOLED touchscreen, this will definitely cut down on the power usage of the phone while it is actively being used.

I speculate that even with the slightly smaller battery, the overall battery life will be similar to the G1. (Not great, and many people have upgraded their battery to support longer life, but good enough for most people...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do not dismiss the potential power savings of the AMOLED touchscreen, this will definitely cut down on the power usage of the phone while it is actively being used.</p>
<p>I speculate that even with the slightly smaller battery, the overall battery life will be similar to the G1. (Not great, and many people have upgraded their battery to support longer life, but good enough for most people&hellip;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jak Crow</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/09/29/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc-with-1000-mah-battery/#comment-48898</link>
		<dc:creator>Jak Crow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=5686#comment-48898</guid>
		<description>Its going to have touchwiz ui. Could be good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its going to have touchwiz ui. Could be good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/09/29/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc-with-1000-mah-battery/#comment-48804</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=5686#comment-48804</guid>
		<description>well it could be exciting if the price is aggressive enough 

I don&#039;t care what the phone looks like if there is finally something on the low end...or even prepay level for android</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well it could be exciting if the price is aggressive enough </p>
<p>I don&rsquo;t care what the phone looks like if there is finally something on the low end&hellip;or even prepay level for android</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StephenSaurusRex</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/09/29/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc-with-1000-mah-battery/#comment-48745</link>
		<dc:creator>StephenSaurusRex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=5686#comment-48745</guid>
		<description>wow, this one is garbage. sincere thanks rob for highlighting the battery. now we know not to bother getting excited over this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, this one is garbage. sincere thanks rob for highlighting the battery. now we know not to bother getting excited over this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 367/368 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: phandroid.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: phandroid.com @ 2012-02-13 22:57:45 -->
