<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ZTE Android Phone In 2010 Could Be Solar Powered</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phandroid.com/2009/06/17/zte-android-phone-in-2010-could-be-solar-powered/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/06/17/zte-android-phone-in-2010-could-be-solar-powered/</link>
	<description>Android Phone News, Rumors, Reviews, Apps, Forums &#38; More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 02:51:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/06/17/zte-android-phone-in-2010-could-be-solar-powered/#comment-30196</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=3387#comment-30196</guid>
		<description>As the CEO of a company that makes solar powered products (for environmental monitoring), I&#039;d love to say that solar is the answer. The sad reality for a phone is that the area-available on a handset and the light to which it is nominally exposed is so minimal (and the cost of the panel so high) that you will net *very* little energy this way. Who wants to leave their phone outside (most commercial windows are tinted to significantly reduce IR transmission) for six hours in exchange for half a charge? The better, faster, cheaper way is to use grid-tied solar or solar power plants outright to charge a traditional chemical cell (battery) in the phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the CEO of a company that makes solar powered products (for environmental monitoring), I&rsquo;d love to say that solar is the answer. The sad reality for a phone is that the area-available on a handset and the light to which it is nominally exposed is so minimal (and the cost of the panel so high) that you will net *very* little energy this way. Who wants to leave their phone outside (most commercial windows are tinted to significantly reduce IR transmission) for six hours in exchange for half a charge? The better, faster, cheaper way is to use grid-tied solar or solar power plants outright to charge a traditional chemical cell (battery) in the phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woyteck</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/06/17/zte-android-phone-in-2010-could-be-solar-powered/#comment-29969</link>
		<dc:creator>Woyteck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=3387#comment-29969</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the iea I had for G1 casing: get a solar panel on the back and charge it whenever you can.
Seriously, Android phones need lots of juice and solar power is the option to go.
I&#039;d love to charge my mobile with thermonuclear power of our Sun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the iea I had for G1 casing: get a solar panel on the back and charge it whenever you can.<br />
Seriously, Android phones need lots of juice and solar power is the option to go.<br />
I&#8217;d love to charge my mobile with thermonuclear power of our Sun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.031 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 289/307 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: phandroid.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: phandroid.com @ 2012-05-27 03:28:13 -->
