<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Huawei U8230 Android Phone Officially Announced!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phandroid.com/2009/06/16/huawei-u8230-android-phone-officially-launches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/06/16/huawei-u8230-android-phone-officially-launches/</link>
	<description>Android Phone News, Rumors, Reviews, Apps, Forums &#38; More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:03:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kris</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/06/16/huawei-u8230-android-phone-officially-launches/#comment-56491</link>
		<dc:creator>kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=3370#comment-56491</guid>
		<description>Is Huawei phones any good Im thinking about purchasing a m750 and I really need to know if it is good quality and is it worth purchasing because I can ony get one phone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Huawei phones any good Im thinking about purchasing a m750 and I really need to know if it is good quality and is it worth purchasing because I can ony get one phone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rmr</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/06/16/huawei-u8230-android-phone-officially-launches/#comment-55405</link>
		<dc:creator>rmr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=3370#comment-55405</guid>
		<description>2.5 mm headphonejack and micro sd slot supported</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2.5 mm headphonejack and micro sd slot supported</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/06/16/huawei-u8230-android-phone-officially-launches/#comment-45306</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 18:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=3370#comment-45306</guid>
		<description>Why can&#039;t they put a good camera on it like 5 megapixle or more</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t they put a good camera on it like 5 megapixle or more</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twrock</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/06/16/huawei-u8230-android-phone-officially-launches/#comment-29904</link>
		<dc:creator>twrock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=3370#comment-29904</guid>
		<description>Yes, this is getting very close to the form-factor that will make me very happy. I too will want to see some form of memory card and wifi before I&#039;m convinced. But I am definitely not interested in a &lt;3.5&quot; screen device. Make it 3.7&quot; and I&#039;ll be even happier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this is getting very close to the form-factor that will make me very happy. I too will want to see some form of memory card and wifi before I&#8217;m convinced. But I am definitely not interested in a &lt;3.5&#8243; screen device. Make it 3.7&#8243; and I&#8217;ll be even happier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blaidrider</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/06/16/huawei-u8230-android-phone-officially-launches/#comment-29900</link>
		<dc:creator>blaidrider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=3370#comment-29900</guid>
		<description>hey show me a 3.5 headphone jack and atleast 8GB of internal and I might be looking at my next phone. A flash for the camera would be awesome but I don&#039;t really use my camera that much (well that might be because the G1&#039;s camera is pretty much garbage even after the cupcake update.) Anyways I&#039;m crossing my fingers for a good phone to come out soon!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey show me a 3.5 headphone jack and atleast 8GB of internal and I might be looking at my next phone. A flash for the camera would be awesome but I don&#8217;t really use my camera that much (well that might be because the G1&#8217;s camera is pretty much garbage even after the cupcake update.) Anyways I&#8217;m crossing my fingers for a good phone to come out soon!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gibbo</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/06/16/huawei-u8230-android-phone-officially-launches/#comment-29867</link>
		<dc:creator>Gibbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=3370#comment-29867</guid>
		<description>Is that a Camera on the front in the first pic?  If so will Donut have Video calling?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that a Camera on the front in the first pic?  If so will Donut have Video calling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/06/16/huawei-u8230-android-phone-officially-launches/#comment-29859</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=3370#comment-29859</guid>
		<description>Wow it looks great! I don&#039;t even care about it not having a keyboard.
I&#039;ve heard Google call it &quot;Chrome Lite.&quot; When they first announced the G1, one of the guys called it Chrome Lite but he used the &quot; &quot; signs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow it looks great! I don&#8217;t even care about it not having a keyboard.<br />
I&#8217;ve heard Google call it &#8220;Chrome Lite.&#8221; When they first announced the G1, one of the guys called it Chrome Lite but he used the &#8221; &#8221; signs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel A. Zorrilla</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/06/16/huawei-u8230-android-phone-officially-launches/#comment-29852</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel A. Zorrilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=3370#comment-29852</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a GREAT looking device. Too bad i&#039;m pretty sure it wont be released in second tier markets such as Argentina, so, i&#039;d be really happy with the Galaxy, Samsung is the second largest brand here and i have hopes for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a GREAT looking device. Too bad i&#8217;m pretty sure it wont be released in second tier markets such as Argentina, so, i&#8217;d be really happy with the Galaxy, Samsung is the second largest brand here and i have hopes for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/06/16/huawei-u8230-android-phone-officially-launches/#comment-29825</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=3370#comment-29825</guid>
		<description>What I don&#039;t understand is why its so hard for them tu put an LED flash on these phones like the one blackberries have? Don&#039;t get me wrong I love my G1 more than I ever liked my old pearl but that had an awsome camera and flash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I don&#8217;t understand is why its so hard for them tu put an LED flash on these phones like the one blackberries have? Don&#8217;t get me wrong I love my G1 more than I ever liked my old pearl but that had an awsome camera and flash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuksy</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/06/16/huawei-u8230-android-phone-officially-launches/#comment-29819</link>
		<dc:creator>chuksy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=3370#comment-29819</guid>
		<description>Am not too bothered about it not having a qwerty keyboard.
But am loving the 3.5&quot; screen,been waiting for a larger screen than the g1 has.However i&#039;d rather the phone was from samsung.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am not too bothered about it not having a qwerty keyboard.<br />
But am loving the 3.5&#8243; screen,been waiting for a larger screen than the g1 has.However i&#8217;d rather the phone was from samsung.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aita</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/06/16/huawei-u8230-android-phone-officially-launches/#comment-29813</link>
		<dc:creator>Aita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=3370#comment-29813</guid>
		<description>Yea I really wish this had come with a hard keyboard however the size of the screen may well make up for that.  Though I am a fan of the original G1 desing I&#039;d be lying if I said this wasn&#039;t a sexy looking phone.  Also I prefer to have at least some face buttons and thnakfully android still requires 4(one of many reasons the iphone irks me).  Oh well I&#039;m a sucker for screen real estate, now just show me the 3G and wi-fi(not necessary butpretty please Huawei) and I&#039;ll have to consider not getting the G1 in december(provided the on  screen keyboard is big enough for my big hands).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea I really wish this had come with a hard keyboard however the size of the screen may well make up for that.  Though I am a fan of the original G1 desing I&#8217;d be lying if I said this wasn&#8217;t a sexy looking phone.  Also I prefer to have at least some face buttons and thnakfully android still requires 4(one of many reasons the iphone irks me).  Oh well I&#8217;m a sucker for screen real estate, now just show me the 3G and wi-fi(not necessary butpretty please Huawei) and I&#8217;ll have to consider not getting the G1 in december(provided the on  screen keyboard is big enough for my big hands).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tre Arrow</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/06/16/huawei-u8230-android-phone-officially-launches/#comment-29811</link>
		<dc:creator>Tre Arrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=3370#comment-29811</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m probably very wrong about this, and I am not a lawyer nor a volunteer fireman, but it was my impression that the webkit (iphone/Safari-like) browser was the browser Google acquired when they bought Android.  So, then later, Google built the Chrome browser from a mish-mash of programming languages and then was later working on porting Chrome to Android, which would, I guess, make it &quot;Chrome Lite&quot;.  And I read that the new Nokia maemo phones (n900) have a light version of Firefox (why do we say &quot;Lite&quot; instead of &quot;Light&quot; when we refer to smaller versions of software?  It makes it seem like diet Cool-Whip or something).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m probably very wrong about this, and I am not a lawyer nor a volunteer fireman, but it was my impression that the webkit (iphone/Safari-like) browser was the browser Google acquired when they bought Android.  So, then later, Google built the Chrome browser from a mish-mash of programming languages and then was later working on porting Chrome to Android, which would, I guess, make it &#8220;Chrome Lite&#8221;.  And I read that the new Nokia maemo phones (n900) have a light version of Firefox (why do we say &#8220;Lite&#8221; instead of &#8220;Light&#8221; when we refer to smaller versions of software?  It makes it seem like diet Cool-Whip or something).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collin</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/06/16/huawei-u8230-android-phone-officially-launches/#comment-29806</link>
		<dc:creator>Collin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=3370#comment-29806</guid>
		<description>I really like this design, and even without a QWERTY seems like a winner, and a bigger screen (3.5) might make up for the lack of keyboard.
I&#039;ll keep my eye on this one

Does anyone know about build quality in Huawei&#039;s handsets?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like this design, and even without a QWERTY seems like a winner, and a bigger screen (3.5) might make up for the lack of keyboard.<br />
I&#8217;ll keep my eye on this one</p>
<p>Does anyone know about build quality in Huawei&#8217;s handsets?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iDavey</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/06/16/huawei-u8230-android-phone-officially-launches/#comment-29803</link>
		<dc:creator>iDavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=3370#comment-29803</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to know what type of screen it is. Resolution. Memory built in. Is there a SD slot. Come on...give details and a ship date Wah-way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to know what type of screen it is. Resolution. Memory built in. Is there a SD slot. Come on&#8230;give details and a ship date Wah-way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/06/16/huawei-u8230-android-phone-officially-launches/#comment-29802</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=3370#comment-29802</guid>
		<description>@phil - because it would make the thing almost twice as thick.

as far as this phone is concerned, the lack of information is maddening.  at least the LCD screen is known, which means my decision to get the samsung galaxy is still valid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@phil &#8211; because it would make the thing almost twice as thick.</p>
<p>as far as this phone is concerned, the lack of information is maddening.  at least the LCD screen is known, which means my decision to get the samsung galaxy is still valid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
