<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dell Droid Gets Rejected</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phandroid.com/2009/03/23/dell-droid-gets-rejected/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/03/23/dell-droid-gets-rejected/</link>
	<description>Android Phone News, Rumors, Reviews, Apps, Forums &#38; More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:24:23 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dell Android Phone Picture Leaked? &#124; Android Phone Fans</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/03/23/dell-droid-gets-rejected/#comment-29612</link>
		<dc:creator>Dell Android Phone Picture Leaked? &#124; Android Phone Fans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=1854#comment-29612</guid>
		<description>[...] chastized Dell quite a bit for their Android phone and overall smartphone attempts after being virtually booed out of North America. But you know what&#8230; at least they&#8217;re trying. And if this leaked image of the first Dell [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] chastized Dell quite a bit for their Android phone and overall smartphone attempts after being virtually booed out of North America. But you know what&#8230; at least they&#8217;re trying. And if this leaked image of the first Dell [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/03/23/dell-droid-gets-rejected/#comment-26539</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 18:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=1854#comment-26539</guid>
		<description>@Solid

Wouldnt most of that be software based? As it stands I know my G1 cant wifi tether (at least without root) within the standard paramaters of the android os, so I dont think thats the case. If the hardware was &quot;too good&quot;, I would imagine the opposite</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Solid</p>
<p>Wouldnt most of that be software based? As it stands I know my G1 cant wifi tether (at least without root) within the standard paramaters of the android os, so I dont think thats the case. If the hardware was &#8220;too good&#8221;, I would imagine the opposite</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solid</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/03/23/dell-droid-gets-rejected/#comment-16016</link>
		<dc:creator>solid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=1854#comment-16016</guid>
		<description>maybe it was rejected because it was too good.  Imagine a phone with bittorrent, skype, wifi tether, etc.  I can see t-mobile saying um no.  We don&#039;t need that on our network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe it was rejected because it was too good.  Imagine a phone with bittorrent, skype, wifi tether, etc.  I can see t-mobile saying um no.  We don&#8217;t need that on our network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eliseobc</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/03/23/dell-droid-gets-rejected/#comment-15998</link>
		<dc:creator>eliseobc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=1854#comment-15998</guid>
		<description>Why they just don&#039;t let the public decide?

Allow everyone to be able to buy it, at a reasonable price. Why the carriers have to decide that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why they just don&#8217;t let the public decide?</p>
<p>Allow everyone to be able to buy it, at a reasonable price. Why the carriers have to decide that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
