<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Android 3.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phandroid.com/2009/02/25/android-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/02/25/android-30/</link>
	<description>Android Phone News, Rumors, Reviews, Apps, Forums &#38; More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 02:51:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathi17</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/02/25/android-30/#comment-24331</link>
		<dc:creator>kathi17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 13:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=1608#comment-24331</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m afraid that the biggest mistake Google made was to release the G1 with waaaay to little internal memory, and a processor that wasn&#039;t quite what it should have been to power future updates.

The only way I think that they would be able to fairly correct this, would be to offer new phones with physical keyboards, 1 gig of memory, and more powerful processers to existing owners at the $179 or lower price. Those of us who are under contract for another two years, and have been doing their beta testing, writing programs, etc. shouldn&#039;t have to wait until our contract is up if we can&#039;t afford $400 or more to replace our underpowered phones. Think about it. We can buy very basic computers for $300 or less.

As early adopters/beta testers/developers, we should demand nothing less. Without us, Android wouldn&#039;t be developing this fast. Google is doing well with Android, and they need to help out the little guys who bought their sub-par devices, and helped to make Android successful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&rsquo;m afraid that the biggest mistake Google made was to release the G1 with waaaay to little internal memory, and a processor that wasn&rsquo;t quite what it should have been to power future updates.</p>
<p>The only way I think that they would be able to fairly correct this, would be to offer new phones with physical keyboards, 1 gig of memory, and more powerful processers to existing owners at the $179 or lower price. Those of us who are under contract for another two years, and have been doing their beta testing, writing programs, etc. shouldn&rsquo;t have to wait until our contract is up if we can&rsquo;t afford $400 or more to replace our underpowered phones. Think about it. We can buy very basic computers for $300 or less.</p>
<p>As early adopters/beta testers/developers, we should demand nothing less. Without us, Android wouldn&rsquo;t be developing this fast. Google is doing well with Android, and they need to help out the little guys who bought their sub-par devices, and helped to make Android successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/02/25/android-30/#comment-13860</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 04:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=1608#comment-13860</guid>
		<description>I am excited to hear that there may be huge leaps and developments going on with the android platform, I&#039;m also happy to hear that the android team is keeping busy on its platform.

However, It leaves me to worry... With the talk of these new versions, are they going to leave us early adopters in the dust? I have a G1 and I dont know the limits of its hardware, but it feels like the os pushes the limits of the phone already... I hope these new versions have major improvements, I just hope I dont have to upgrade to get my hands on a new version of android... but maybe thats just the case.  My XP machine probably couldnt handle vista, just like an old Imac couldnt run Leopard.

Oh well, i guess thats just how it works. But the thing is... are they gonna bust out a hardware trumping version too soon where I&#039;ll have to dish out another wad of money for a new device at full price before my contract is up? (I cant renew my contract and get that new customer/contract price until a couple of years)

Probably going to get screwed, would google do that to me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am excited to hear that there may be huge leaps and developments going on with the android platform, I&rsquo;m also happy to hear that the android team is keeping busy on its platform.</p>
<p>However, It leaves me to worry&hellip; With the talk of these new versions, are they going to leave us early adopters in the dust? I have a G1 and I dont know the limits of its hardware, but it feels like the os pushes the limits of the phone already&hellip; I hope these new versions have major improvements, I just hope I dont have to upgrade to get my hands on a new version of android&hellip; but maybe thats just the case.  My XP machine probably couldnt handle vista, just like an old Imac couldnt run Leopard.</p>
<p>Oh well, i guess thats just how it works. But the thing is&hellip; are they gonna bust out a hardware trumping version too soon where I&rsquo;ll have to dish out another wad of money for a new device at full price before my contract is up? (I cant renew my contract and get that new customer/contract price until a couple of years)</p>
<p>Probably going to get screwed, would google do that to me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brie</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/02/25/android-30/#comment-13845</link>
		<dc:creator>brie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=1608#comment-13845</guid>
		<description>Talk of 3.0 and no &quot;cupcake&quot;, sort of like buying ingredients for the Entree without ever being served the appetizer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk of 3.0 and no &ldquo;cupcake&rdquo;, sort of like buying ingredients for the Entree without ever being served the appetizer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gram</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/02/25/android-30/#comment-13770</link>
		<dc:creator>Gram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 21:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=1608#comment-13770</guid>
		<description>I think the only thing sad about Android is its total non-existence in Canada. Get exposed android there is more then just the USA for market. I hope the Magic changes this as it is &quot;said&quot; to be released in Europe and other regions.

Anyway I wonder how different the phone needs to be to be compatible with the next version of Android?

Why can I not just upgrade since it runs like Java. Java is built on a cross platform bases as it runs of a virtual-layer that can be applied to whatever hardware its other counterparts could run on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the only thing sad about Android is its total non-existence in Canada. Get exposed android there is more then just the USA for market. I hope the Magic changes this as it is &ldquo;said&rdquo; to be released in Europe and other regions.</p>
<p>Anyway I wonder how different the phone needs to be to be compatible with the next version of Android?</p>
<p>Why can I not just upgrade since it runs like Java. Java is built on a cross platform bases as it runs of a virtual-layer that can be applied to whatever hardware its other counterparts could run on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/02/25/android-30/#comment-13679</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=1608#comment-13679</guid>
		<description>I would like to add to my previous comment though..

Android kicks Ass! This G1 is by far, the best, most user friendly phone I have ever used. If this phone never got another update again, I&#039;d still be happy with it. Maybe 2.0 IS lame, ask Bill Gates.. how many times have they tried to &quot;improve&quot; something, only to screw it up in the end. Also, now that Ive had more time to think about the drastic jump from version to version.. maybe... just maybe.. they&#039;re experimenting with entirely rewritten kernels hence the reason for the big jumps. Keep up the great info hunting skills Rob!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to add to my previous comment though..</p>
<p>Android kicks Ass! This G1 is by far, the best, most user friendly phone I have ever used. If this phone never got another update again, I&rsquo;d still be happy with it. Maybe 2.0 IS lame, ask Bill Gates.. how many times have they tried to &ldquo;improve&rdquo; something, only to screw it up in the end. Also, now that Ive had more time to think about the drastic jump from version to version.. maybe&hellip; just maybe.. they&rsquo;re experimenting with entirely rewritten kernels hence the reason for the big jumps. Keep up the great info hunting skills Rob!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnkzin</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/02/25/android-30/#comment-13644</link>
		<dc:creator>johnkzin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=1608#comment-13644</guid>
		<description>Personally, &quot;Android 1.0&quot; is frankly better than any other phone platform I&#039;ve used, except MAYBE the iPhone, and that&#039;s debtable.

Better than Symbian ... Symbian has some more features, but Android&#039;s user experience is better.

Better than Blackberry ... ugh, awful piece of crap that platform is.  All it has is business apps, but the presentation/etc.?  absolute crap.

Better than the custom OS&#039;s by a ton.

I have to admit I haven&#039;t used WinMo much, but I doubt I ever would anyway.

As for the iPhone ... there&#039;s some UI things that Android could do better.  But what Android&#039;s problem isn&#039;t &quot;sad&quot; or &quot;deficiency&quot;, it&#039;s that it just hasn&#039;t had time to grow its feature set and application set yet.  That&#039;s not matter of &quot;2.0&quot;, that&#039;s just a matter of giving the app developers a little more time to deliver the goods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, &ldquo;Android 1.0&Prime; is frankly better than any other phone platform I&rsquo;ve used, except MAYBE the iPhone, and that&rsquo;s debtable.</p>
<p>Better than Symbian &hellip; Symbian has some more features, but Android&rsquo;s user experience is better.</p>
<p>Better than Blackberry &hellip; ugh, awful piece of crap that platform is.  All it has is business apps, but the presentation/etc.?  absolute crap.</p>
<p>Better than the custom OS&rsquo;s by a ton.</p>
<p>I have to admit I haven&rsquo;t used WinMo much, but I doubt I ever would anyway.</p>
<p>As for the iPhone &hellip; there&rsquo;s some UI things that Android could do better.  But what Android&rsquo;s problem isn&rsquo;t &ldquo;sad&rdquo; or &ldquo;deficiency&rdquo;, it&rsquo;s that it just hasn&rsquo;t had time to grow its feature set and application set yet.  That&rsquo;s not matter of &ldquo;2.0&Prime;, that&rsquo;s just a matter of giving the app developers a little more time to deliver the goods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herbert</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/02/25/android-30/#comment-13618</link>
		<dc:creator>Herbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=1608#comment-13618</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m guessing Android 2.0 will be for Netbook devices launched towards the end of this year.  Initially it will look &quot;pretty sad&quot; when compared to WinXP, Vista or Ubuntu.  At least until some advanced applications are developed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&rsquo;m guessing Android 2.0 will be for Netbook devices launched towards the end of this year.  Initially it will look &ldquo;pretty sad&rdquo; when compared to WinXP, Vista or Ubuntu.  At least until some advanced applications are developed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Kaufman - Techlife</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/02/25/android-30/#comment-13609</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kaufman - Techlife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=1608#comment-13609</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Rich.  Seems odd.  

I would also wonder if G1 users will see full OS version updates on their current  device.  I can put newer versions of OS&#039;s on my existing hardware (usually) so I would hope there is some backwards compatibility built in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Rich.  Seems odd.  </p>
<p>I would also wonder if G1 users will see full OS version updates on their current  device.  I can put newer versions of OS&rsquo;s on my existing hardware (usually) so I would hope there is some backwards compatibility built in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Jackson</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/02/25/android-30/#comment-13608</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=1608#comment-13608</guid>
		<description>@Jonn.N - keep us posted

@Rich - I agree with your criticism. To take it one step further, maybe Version 3 is Cupcake! Nobody really knows. But I think one thing to get across is that the Android out there now is like a newborn baby. This thing is only going to develop, grow and become more powerful and if you ask me, it is already pretty darn awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jonn.N &ndash; keep us posted</p>
<p>@Rich &ndash; I agree with your criticism. To take it one step further, maybe Version 3 is Cupcake! Nobody really knows. But I think one thing to get across is that the Android out there now is like a newborn baby. This thing is only going to develop, grow and become more powerful and if you ask me, it is already pretty darn awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/02/25/android-30/#comment-13605</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=1608#comment-13605</guid>
		<description>With all the Cupcake whiners out there, did anyone stop to think that maybe Version 2 is Cupcake? maybe. maybe not. Cupcake could even be 1.5.

Something doesnt sound right in that article, why could they continue on with version 3 when they could just call version 3, version 2? Then say version 1.5 was sad. Thats like Microsoft jumping to Windows 9 and saying 7 and 8 were sad. They dont do that, they simply call them Betas and the final name is 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the Cupcake whiners out there, did anyone stop to think that maybe Version 2 is Cupcake? maybe. maybe not. Cupcake could even be 1.5.</p>
<p>Something doesnt sound right in that article, why could they continue on with version 3 when they could just call version 3, version 2? Then say version 1.5 was sad. Thats like Microsoft jumping to Windows 9 and saying 7 and 8 were sad. They dont do that, they simply call them Betas and the final name is 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonno.N</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/02/25/android-30/#comment-13598</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonno.N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=1608#comment-13598</guid>
		<description>Maybe version2 was based on some kind of platform that they thought may be ideal for some processes, and they figured they&#039;d give it a go to see if it could handle the rest of the phone as well, and shortly they realized it wouldn&#039;t and decided to scrap it and just go to the next idea on the drawing board. 

On a somewhat related note: I know a chick that works at google and they have SICK ASS PHONE SKINS with custom android artwork. I&#039;m gonna get her to hook one up for me, and I&#039;ll ask if she&#039;s got any inside buzz about Android V.2 or 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe version2 was based on some kind of platform that they thought may be ideal for some processes, and they figured they&rsquo;d give it a go to see if it could handle the rest of the phone as well, and shortly they realized it wouldn&rsquo;t and decided to scrap it and just go to the next idea on the drawing board. </p>
<p>On a somewhat related note: I know a chick that works at google and they have SICK ASS PHONE SKINS with custom android artwork. I&rsquo;m gonna get her to hook one up for me, and I&rsquo;ll ask if she&rsquo;s got any inside buzz about Android V.2 or 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BC</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2009/02/25/android-30/#comment-13593</link>
		<dc:creator>BC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/?p=1608#comment-13593</guid>
		<description>Maybe its a case of version 2 not meeting all the goals they set out for it? Instead of trying to make do everything they want, they simply chose to move on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe its a case of version 2 not meeting all the goals they set out for it? Instead of trying to make do everything they want, they simply chose to move on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.028 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 399/417 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: phandroid.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: phandroid.com @ 2012-05-25 15:06:30 -->
