<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google says Android Will Outsell the iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phandroid.com/2008/03/18/google-says-android-will-outsell-the-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phandroid.com/2008/03/18/google-says-android-will-outsell-the-iphone/</link>
	<description>Android Phone News, Rumors, Reviews, Apps, Forums &#38; More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 02:51:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Ventures and Rich Miner &#124; Android Phone Fans</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2008/03/18/google-says-android-will-outsell-the-iphone/#comment-16033</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Ventures and Rich Miner &#124; Android Phone Fans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/google-says-android-will-outsell-the-iphone#comment-16033</guid>
		<description>[...] As a refresher, here is Rich Miner way back in February 2008. Oh yeah&#8230; he is also the guy that claimed Android will outsell the iPhone: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As a refresher, here is Rich Miner way back in February 2008. Oh yeah&hellip; he is also the guy that claimed Android will outsell the iPhone: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Android vs. LiMo Conflict &#124; Android Phone Fans</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2008/03/18/google-says-android-will-outsell-the-iphone/#comment-750</link>
		<dc:creator>The Android vs. LiMo Conflict &#124; Android Phone Fans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/google-says-android-will-outsell-the-iphone#comment-750</guid>
		<description>[...] of all, since Android will almost certainly outsell the iPhone, we predict those whopping numbers will be a lot more whopping than 20 percent. In addition, what [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of all, since Android will almost certainly outsell the iPhone, we predict those whopping numbers will be a lot more whopping than 20 percent. In addition, what [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Am I on Crazy Pills</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2008/03/18/google-says-android-will-outsell-the-iphone/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Am I on Crazy Pills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/google-says-android-will-outsell-the-iphone#comment-428</guid>
		<description>Google only succeeded at *web search*!?

I guess consumer GIS and mapping services don&#039;t count? Email? Blogs (remember when your personal site was choked with yahoo and geocities popups)?

Google is moving into new markets so they will fail!? Again, GIS, Keyhole. 

You people are out of your minds. Buy iPhones if that makes you happy. I am not knocking Apple&#039;s accomplishments. But don&#039;t pretend Google has not succeeded at anything when the past six years has seen nothing but unprecedented growth and successful products/services -- even if you don&#039;t personally like them.

I personally can&#039;t stand the way Apple locks-in and strangles their own customers. But if having a device whose name starts with &quot;i&quot; makes you happier, then buy the Apple device. 

The point of the SDK restrictions is that iPhone cannot possibly compete with an open source mobile platform with those kinds of restrictions. This ensures the iPhone market will always be a small niche of Apple fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google only succeeded at *web search*!?</p>
<p>I guess consumer GIS and mapping services don&rsquo;t count? Email? Blogs (remember when your personal site was choked with yahoo and geocities popups)?</p>
<p>Google is moving into new markets so they will fail!? Again, GIS, Keyhole. </p>
<p>You people are out of your minds. Buy iPhones if that makes you happy. I am not knocking Apple&rsquo;s accomplishments. But don&rsquo;t pretend Google has not succeeded at anything when the past six years has seen nothing but unprecedented growth and successful products/services &mdash; even if you don&rsquo;t personally like them.</p>
<p>I personally can&rsquo;t stand the way Apple locks-in and strangles their own customers. But if having a device whose name starts with &ldquo;i&rdquo; makes you happier, then buy the Apple device. </p>
<p>The point of the SDK restrictions is that iPhone cannot possibly compete with an open source mobile platform with those kinds of restrictions. This ensures the iPhone market will always be a small niche of Apple fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phandroid.com</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2008/03/18/google-says-android-will-outsell-the-iphone/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>phandroid.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/google-says-android-will-outsell-the-iphone#comment-385</guid>
		<description>Me: (I hope I&#039;m not really talking to myself)

I think the difference between Android and &quot;everything else&quot; is that the viable alternatives to Android aren&#039;t very good... thats the purpose in Android. Combine that with the fact that 30+ companies are backing its success, including manufacturers creating handheld devices built specifically for the platform who will contribute millions of marketing dollars to make sure they float... I think the power is there to make it work. Android just has to be &quot;good enough&quot; when it is released.

A lot of what will make it &quot;good enough&quot; is a wealth of applications and a huge number of consumers who are using the applications and able to connect with eachother BECAUSE of the applications. Those two remain to be seen.

Just because Google hasn&#039;t &quot;hit it big&quot; with anything besides web search doesn&#039;t mean they won&#039;t on the &quot;next try&quot; - you can&#039;t deny that Android has huge potential. Look at Gmail and Google Maps... these are services that AREN&#039;T search functions that have gained mass appeal.

I just think Android has all the stars in alignment for revolutionary success. Although, I am willing to admit that your argument does hold some weight and in that sense is a fair criticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me: (I hope I&rsquo;m not really talking to myself)</p>
<p>I think the difference between Android and &ldquo;everything else&rdquo; is that the viable alternatives to Android aren&rsquo;t very good&hellip; thats the purpose in Android. Combine that with the fact that 30+ companies are backing its success, including manufacturers creating handheld devices built specifically for the platform who will contribute millions of marketing dollars to make sure they float&hellip; I think the power is there to make it work. Android just has to be &ldquo;good enough&rdquo; when it is released.</p>
<p>A lot of what will make it &ldquo;good enough&rdquo; is a wealth of applications and a huge number of consumers who are using the applications and able to connect with eachother BECAUSE of the applications. Those two remain to be seen.</p>
<p>Just because Google hasn&rsquo;t &ldquo;hit it big&rdquo; with anything besides web search doesn&rsquo;t mean they won&rsquo;t on the &ldquo;next try&rdquo; &ndash; you can&rsquo;t deny that Android has huge potential. Look at Gmail and Google Maps&hellip; these are services that AREN&rsquo;T search functions that have gained mass appeal.</p>
<p>I just think Android has all the stars in alignment for revolutionary success. Although, I am willing to admit that your argument does hold some weight and in that sense is a fair criticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2008/03/18/google-says-android-will-outsell-the-iphone/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/google-says-android-will-outsell-the-iphone#comment-383</guid>
		<description>Come on, if anything those manufacturers will change to it will be Windows Mobile. Nowadays Google is going into the territory it has no knowledge of, and it fails in pretty much everything unrelated to the web search. Why will Android be any different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, if anything those manufacturers will change to it will be Windows Mobile. Nowadays Google is going into the territory it has no knowledge of, and it fails in pretty much everything unrelated to the web search. Why will Android be any different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: makambo</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2008/03/18/google-says-android-will-outsell-the-iphone/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>makambo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 01:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/google-says-android-will-outsell-the-iphone#comment-321</guid>
		<description>Does nobody see history repeating here? In the early days of home computing Apple competed against Microsoft, and MS established itself in the market by licensing its software to as many manufacturers as it could. Now Google ensures that its software will run on as many mobile phones as possible. 

I wont say that Apples software is bad, as far as I know its actually very good. Lets just hope that we wont see another war in the industry like the one between MS and Apple. It wouldnt do anyone any good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does nobody see history repeating here? In the early days of home computing Apple competed against Microsoft, and MS established itself in the market by licensing its software to as many manufacturers as it could. Now Google ensures that its software will run on as many mobile phones as possible. </p>
<p>I wont say that Apples software is bad, as far as I know its actually very good. Lets just hope that we wont see another war in the industry like the one between MS and Apple. It wouldnt do anyone any good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Rundle</title>
		<link>http://phandroid.com/2008/03/18/google-says-android-will-outsell-the-iphone/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Rundle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phandroid.com/google-says-android-will-outsell-the-iphone#comment-319</guid>
		<description>What did anyone expect a Google executive to say... that the iPhone SDK was better?  Of course not.  Also, I think Miner might have his Michael Dell &quot;give the shares back to the shareholders&quot; moment by saying that the restrictions are &quot;laugh-out-loud, crap&quot; especially since people haven&#039;t seen what applications are currently in development.  I&#039;m developing an iPhone application right now, as are thousands of people, and the benefits of creating a native iPhone app and getting onto the App Store outweigh the restrictions, at least for me.

I can obviously see the interesting applications that are not able to be created --- at this time -- but that doesn&#039;t mean that all interesting/useful/popular applications are nixed because they can&#039;t run in the background or run interpreted code.  There are going to be thousands of programs and games available for people to download that fully comply with the restrictions, and a whole lot of iPhone owners will be going crazy downloading, comparing, and reviewing these apps.  Also, the SDK is currently in beta and Apple is actively seeking feedback to make it better, so there might be some restrictions lifted and functionality added in the coming months.  So if the things that make Miner upset about the SDK are remedied, what will his quote sound like then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What did anyone expect a Google executive to say&hellip; that the iPhone SDK was better?  Of course not.  Also, I think Miner might have his Michael Dell &ldquo;give the shares back to the shareholders&rdquo; moment by saying that the restrictions are &ldquo;laugh-out-loud, crap&rdquo; especially since people haven&rsquo;t seen what applications are currently in development.  I&rsquo;m developing an iPhone application right now, as are thousands of people, and the benefits of creating a native iPhone app and getting onto the App Store outweigh the restrictions, at least for me.</p>
<p>I can obviously see the interesting applications that are not able to be created &mdash; at this time &mdash; but that doesn&rsquo;t mean that all interesting/useful/popular applications are nixed because they can&rsquo;t run in the background or run interpreted code.  There are going to be thousands of programs and games available for people to download that fully comply with the restrictions, and a whole lot of iPhone owners will be going crazy downloading, comparing, and reviewing these apps.  Also, the SDK is currently in beta and Apple is actively seeking feedback to make it better, so there might be some restrictions lifted and functionality added in the coming months.  So if the things that make Miner upset about the SDK are remedied, what will his quote sound like then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.025 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 344/362 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: phandroid.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: phandroid.com @ 2012-05-25 02:28:49 -->
